[R-390] 390() vs 390(A)
Roy Morgan
roy.morgan at nist.gov
Mon Dec 27 14:29:10 EST 2004
At 01:46 PM 12/27/2004, Paul H. Anderson wrote:
>Don't forget the R-389,
>
>The VFO and RF decks of the R-389 are very different,
An understatement!
>and there is a
>rectifier stack for producing DC for the R-389 tuning motor. Oddly, the
>R-391, which also has a DC motor for tuning, doesn't have the rectifier
>stack. There probably wasn't room, if I had to guess.
The auto tuning motors in the R-391 take MUCH more current than the tuning
motor in the R-389. In the R-391, both the KC and MC setting mechanisms
are moved by (separate) Motors and associated position setting
mechanisms. The DC supply for that is external to the radio, and if I
remember correctly, is about the same size as the radio itself. In the
R-389, only the single tuning knob is moved, so the mechanical work (torque
times rotations per minute) is much less. There is no presetting of
frequencies in the R-389. The motor is there to assist the operator in
moving the many many turns (up to 50) from one spot in the frequency range
to another.
Roy
- Roy Morgan, K1LKY since 1959 - Keep 'em Glowing!
7130 Panorama Drive, Derwood MD 20855
Home: 301-330-8828 Cell 301-928-7794
Work: Voice: 301-975-3254, Fax: 301-948-6213
roy.morgan at nist.gov --
More information about the R-390
mailing list