[R-390] Signal Generators (was: Deoxit)
Cecil Acuff
[email protected]
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 09:56:33 -0600
Another excellent option and much more inexpensive than the 8640B is the old
HP-606 A/B. They are built like a tank and seem to last forever. Very easy
to use and a true boat anchor in it's own rite....
Cecil...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Wilson" <[email protected]>
To: "Sam Doughty" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [R-390] Signal Generators (was: Deoxit)
> I had the URM-25 for a while, but it is harder to use and does not get
down
> to the low signal levels you need to measure sensitivity on the R-390A.
> Even with attenuators inline, it leaks too much signal to be accurate for
> low levels.
>
> I now have the HP 8640B with options 1 and 3. This is a really nice
signal
> generator, includes a frequency counter, is accurate at low levels, etc,
> etc. If mine ever broke beyond repair, I'd have to quickly find and buy
> another one.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Walter - KK4DF
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sam Doughty" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 9:28 PM
> Subject: [R-390] Deoxit
>
>
> > Thanks everybody for the info on the Deoxit.
> > Another question: What's a good signal generator for the 390?
> > Looks like the URM-25 series is a good choice, also the HP8640 might be
a
> > good one. Thanks, Sam
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-390 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>