[R-390] Isolation Transformer update
Scott, Barry (Clyde B)
[email protected]
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:47:09 -0600
I agree. I don't like to leave wallwarts plugged in unless it is for
something needful like charging the cordless phone, etc.
As far as this 1KVA isolation transformer is concerned, everytime I try to
hang it on the wall, it falls out of the recepticle. :)
Seriously, the isolation transformer will only be switched on when the shack
is in use. Everything goes dark when I leave the shack for the evening.
Too many things to worry about out there that a single flip of a big switch
doesn't take care of.
Barry(III) - N4BUQ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Hauser [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:36 AM
> To: Scott, Barry (Clyde B); R390 (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [R-390] Isolation Transformer update
>
>
> Don't know how typical that is -- doesn't sound unreasonable.
> But then,
> that's why power is switched at the primary .... except for a
> lot of new
> stuff.
>
> Wherever wallwarts are used, there's a constant drain even
> when the devices
> connected to them are turned off. Originally, these were
> mostly for use
> with small devices that were otherwise battery operated and
> mostly on a
> part-time basis.. However, there are many AC only as well as portable
> equipment with wallwarts whether they make sense or not.
> That's so the
> manufacturers don't have to design for mains voltage and
> UL/CSA/CE approval
> for the unit itself which only "sees" low voltage AC or DC.
> Also makes it
> easier and cheaper to provide for various domestic supply
> voltages by simply
> packing the appropriate wallwart in the box.
>
> Though well forgotten by now (pre-9/11), one of Dubya's
> early speeches
> about energy conservation called these things "power
> vampires" that consume
> even when not in use. And that's because the primary is
> connected 24/7.
> Look around -- most computer accessories, even tabletop communications
> receivers, cordless phone bases, you name it. Probably
> average about 10-20
> of these things per household. Leave 'em all plugged in,
> turn everything
> else off, then go read your meter. I suppose it can add up.
> (Touch some --
> see how warm some of them run on idle.)
>
> While most of the wallwarts have some kind of approval
> marking, most all
> have no internal fuse or thermal breaker. If they fail, most
> will begin to
> burn up well before tripping a 15 or 20 amp breaker.
>
> Gettin' old here. Just mention something about primary
> windings drawing
> current with no load .. and I run off at the keyboard on a
> wallwart rant.
> Don't you just love the ones that don't have the
> manufacturer's name or
> model number, so when you disconnect a bunch .... nevermind.
> I'm starting
> to sound like Andy Rooney.
>
> So you were saying? 350 ma unloaded? Don' t look know but .... ;-)
>
> Barry
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott, Barry (Clyde B)" <[email protected]>
> To: "R390 (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:46 AM
> Subject: [R-390] Isolation Transformer update
>
>
> > I did some experimentation last night. With no load and
> the primaries
> > connected in parallel at the 120V tap, the primary drew
> about 350mA. At
> the
> > 110V tap, it drew almost 500mA.
> >
> > I then connected the series 75W light bulb. The 120V tap
> caused a dull
> glow
> > while the 110V tap produced about twice that brightness
> (although still
> > quite dull).
> >
> > I didn't attempt the primary at the 104V tap. I did notice the
> transformer
> > produced a bit more hum at full voltage when at the 110V
> tap than at the
> > 120V tap. I did not notice any heating, but I didn't leave
> it on very
> long
> > either.
> >
> > Do these results sound typical? I've never examined the
> primary current
> > draw on a transformer at no load.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Barry(III) - N4BUQ
> > _______________________________________________
> > R-390 mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390
>
>