[R-390] Hi

Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:07:51 -0400

I understand your concern and I do agree that that you should get the sole
credit for these often used terms;  R-390 non-VLF, R-390 non-391 (sometimes
referred to as the R-390 non-autotune), R-390 non-392,  KWM-2 non-A and
75S-3 non-A-non-B-non-C.
The terms that you are credited with introducing  certainly state the items
as described.  I am sure they will soon be in use throughout the radio
community.
I, and I am sure, all of us, appreciate your continuing efforts in providing
clarity in this matter!

Jim Simmons

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Todd Bigelow - PS" <[email protected]>
To: "Jim Simmons" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [R-390] Hi

> Jim Simmons wrote:
>
> >I have been thinking about the use of the term "non-A", I have changed my
> >mind, and now fully support the use of the term "non A". However to
> >accomplish this and to insure perfect clarity, we will have to refer to
the
> >R390A as the non, non A and keep referring to the R390 as the non A.
> >It's clear, easy to understand and will stop the confusing caused by
using
> >the correct terms of R390 or 390A.
> >
> Okay, but I still get credit for R-390 non-VLF, R-390 non-391 (sometimes
> referred to as the R-390 non-autotune), R-390 non-392,  KWM-2 non-A and
> 75S-3 non-A-non-B-non-C
>
> Please don't confuse any of these with the R-390 sans-covers.
>
> ~Boomer,  KA1KAQ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390