[R-390] confusion

Tue, 07 May 2002 21:08:24 -0700

Hi Les,I tend to agree with you.I know there are a few ardent advocates out
there who would never own a R390A,because of the cost cutting redesign.I
have heard a couple of spirited debates.I own a few  A units and one non A
and a R392.Actually I like them all.73 Gregory                   Hammarlund!
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [R-390] confusion


>
> In a message dated 05-07-02 5:28:26 PM, [email protected] writes:
>
> << Great banter guys!Now which is the better rx the A or the non -A?I
>
> understand the evoloution ,but which in your opinion is the best made.more
>
> stable and sensitive.I have both and tend to favor the non A until
something
>
> goes south.Some parts are harder to find nowadays.73 Gregory Mengell >>
>
> Hi greg,
>
> Long time...........
>
> IMHO, the R-390/URR (non A to the unwashed)...:-) is the better receiver.
> Remember, the R-390A/URR is a reduced price version the Signal Corps
> requested.
>
> Take it from there...........Let the flames begin!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
>                   Les Locklear
> " That's my story and I'm sticking to it "
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390