[R-390] Re: Hammarlund in the Subject

[Michael Watts]

I second what Todd has said here (see below).  I enjoyed the whole thread until some people
started complaining.

Michael

--- Todd Bigelow - PS <tbigelow@pop.state.vt.us> wrote:
> Bruce - KB6LWN wrote:
> 
> > Ummm..  Uhhh..  Because I'm not the lazy twit
> > that couldn't be bothered to edit the subject
> > line to reflect the ACTUAL content/thread of
> > the post ???  Just guessing here ;)
> 
> True - you were just the twit who decided to rant about it like someone pissed
> in your Cheerios. Now I'm the twit responding to you. See? It all makes sense
> if you think about it a bit. ;)
> 
> > That's kind of like that Lame 'delete key' argument.
> > Sure makes it nice for those that live their lives
> > as irresponsible members of society, doesn't it ?!
> 
> Or really miserable for the politically-correct types who think everything
> should be done strictly by their terms, since they are obviously the best,
> most correct terms. You seem to think others are acting irresponsibly, yet you
> have no intent of taking any responsibility for yourself by not reading(sorta
> like using the delete key) items that don't interest you. Instead you imply
> that *all* the responsibility lies with other posters and *none* with you.
> Hmmmm...
> 
> Many of us enjoy discussing the SP-600 made by [Hammarlund], even using one
> when possible. And, while I won't try to speak for everyone else, I also enjoy
> the stories passed on by others who lived and worked in a time that we can now
> only read about. To me, it gives a more life and meaning to an
> otherwise-obscure piece of old radio gear sitting in front of me.
> 
> > And what about those that use those tags (as they
> > were originally meant to be used) to filter their
> > incoming mail to the proper folder (to use a Win-
> > doze term).  I guess they need to go in and edit
> > their filters or add an additional one that checks
> > to see if the "[R-390]" tag ALSO exists in the subj
> > line, just so the lamers that are too lazy to make
> > the change in the subj don't take a chance of cramp-
> > ing their fingers ???!!!   Makes sense to me!   NOT!
> 
> > Bruce
> 
> Well, I'm really confused here, Bruce - why not a rant about the words "Boys
> Toys" still being in the subject line as well, when the conversation had
> obviously turned to life experiences, etc.? Pretty much unrelated, so it fits
> with the rest of your argument. Why are you so put out of the topic of
> [Hammarlund] still appearing in the same topic with [R-390] but none of the
> other issues that would also fall into the category of being off topic or
> otherwise 'filter-able'?
> 
> I have a theory, Bruce - you could be suffering from "R-390/Internet
> Overload". It's possible that Don might have some Prozac samples available
> that he possibly keeps on hand for just such an emergency here on the list.
> 
> In the meantime, just put the keyboard down and back away.... slooooooowly,
> now....
> 
> Todd
>  --
> Be sure to tune in next week for another episode of "Do it MY way or I'll
> SCREAM!!!"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> R-390 mailing list
> R-390@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com