[R-390] Capehart or Collins: which is better?

Fri, 23 Aug 2002 05:58:17 -1000

Like comparing Red Delicious and Macintosh, they're both apples.  Just 
because you have a Ca or Co label on the front, all the internal modules 
have been intermixed while Uncle had custody.

>From: kwylow zinjanthropus <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [R-390] Capehart or Collins: which is better?
>Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>All:
>
>Just wanted to know which unit is better?  A Collins built R-390A or a 
>Capehart built R-390A? I'd like to know in terms of sensitivity, quality, 
>etc. I'm contemplating ridding myself of a Capehart R-390A (in pretty good 
>condition) for a slighly used R-390A built by Collins.
>
>I suspect that I'll have higher sensitivity, more quality components, and 
>an overall better receiver if I make the switch. What do you think? 73's de 
>Cal, N6KYR.
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
>The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
>or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
>Please post in Plain-Text only.---
>_______________________________________________
>R-390 mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-390

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com