[R-390] [r390] Question
Barry Hauser
Barry Hauser <[email protected]>
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:48:45 -0400
Hi Dave:
You wrote:
> Cupla days ago I posted a plea for help with my R-391 autotune but was
> advised by the autoresponder that the moderator had to approve my posting.
> So far the moderator has not approved so I assume it is not permitted to
> discuss R-391 on this list.
Sounds like a glitch to me. I don't think the R-390 list is set up for
manual screening of every post as are some of the other reflectors.
However, the "mailman" software may have automatically screened your post,
triggered by something or other, and responded with a catch-all message that
was misleading, as is customary for software error messages in general.
For instance, with the old majordomo system, any post with the word "h e l
p" in the subject line would get routed to the list manager. Could be the
same now. Also, posts are screened if they contain html, rich
text/formatting, or attachments.
> So I posted my plea on the Collins list and received an immediate
response.
> So I guess this list is just for R-390A afficianados which is fine with
me.
Not at all, we post on '391's and other stuff all the time.
> Maybe this one will bounce too?
Maybe the "mailman" system couldn't believe Dave Medley would be needing
help on a '391 and suffered a boolean crisis such as "Name = Medley; R-391
IS LIKE R-390 non-A; Message contains 'Medley needs H E L P'; When Subject
Contains 'non-A" Medley = H E L P E R, NOT HELPEE; >>>SET KLAXTON BIT TO 1,
AAAAOOOOOGAHHH!!!!, NON PARITY CONDITION EXISTS, SET IMPOSTOR FLAG BIT TO 1,
FORWARD POST TO LIST MANAGER.
Or maybe it didn't go that way at all.. ;-)
Barry