[R-1051] R-1051G manual on line

Tue Jul 11 14:01:20 EDT 2017

Don’t know why but have seen way more RF-2368/RF-590 family of radios then the RF-550, just personal preferences but think the RF-590 is a way better looking radio. Just like the later series R-1051G or H compared to the A and B series.
Let's not waste time discussing performance or technical advantages but go right to the important part, looks! But have to also say that in my mind the ugliest, biggest and heaviest radios still looks better than any of the stupid little SDR receivers that I have seen.

Ray F/KA3EKH

-----Original Message-----
From: r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob kb8tq
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:46 PM
To: R-1051 Discussion Group <r-1051 at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [R-1051] R-1051G manual on line

Hi

The RF-550 was a proposed replacement before the 590. The 590 came along when the RFP was expanded to include replacing the R-390.

Bob

> On Jul 11, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu> wrote:
> 
> RF-2368 replaced many a 1051, it has a tuning dial. Think the big thing is that you can remote a RF-2368/RF-590 way better than anything you can do with an R-1051. Perhaps computer control did more then anything else to kill the idea of lots of dedicated receivers?
> 
> 
> Ray F/KA3EKH
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> [mailto:r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob kb8tq
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:32 PM
> To: R-1051 Discussion Group <r-1051 at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [R-1051] R-1051G manual on line
> 
> Hi
> 
> A lot of it depends on what kind of listening you happen to be into. If it’s “I want to watch for *this guy* at *that frequency*, it’s the ideal radio for the task. Set up one of your stack of 1051’s there and let it run for a few weeks / months. 
> 
> Speaking of stacks of 1051’s, most of the pictures of them I’ve seen in use, were indeed stacks of radios. I’m guessing they are representative of at least 90% of the way the radios were used. Most of the replacement radios for the 1051 had the same basic design limits. You punch in a frequency and let it sit. Band cruising was not a required feature.
> 
> Bob
> 
>> On Jul 11, 2017, at 11:17 AM, paul swed <paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> OK I see the comparison to a ham transceiver and these are not. Yes 
>> fixed frequency they are. Having used them in the Navy they were just 
>> there. If no signal then the signal wasn't there. Took the frequency 
>> question out of the communications question and that made sense.
>> But what a pain for general listening.
>> Funny you mention the T827s and URT23s. Almost picked one up 20 years ago.
>> Glad I didn't. Sure couldn't move one of them today.
>> Regards
>> Paul
>> WB8TSL
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Nick England <navy.radio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Joseph - can you please shoot some photos of your E model some 
>>> day? I'd like to add them to the web page.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nick
>>> 
>>> Nick England K4NYW
>>> www.navy-radio.com
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Joseph Pinner <jpinner33 at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have an E and G.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/11/2017 1:53 AM, L D Ritta wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I wonder how much the sythersizer module has changed since the 
>>>>> introduction of the R-1051D I have an R-1051F and wonder how 
>>>>> different mine is from the R-1051G as I don't have an manual.
>>>>> Any ideas, how many users have receivers that do not have six 
>>>>> pack's
>>> that
>>>>> is
>>>>> are not A, B, C radios.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lee
>>>>> --
>>>>> Joseph Pinner
>>>>> Kingston, TN
>>>>> 
>>>>> KC5IJD / AFA4JP
>>>>> Roane County OES 408
>>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>>> R-1051 mailing list
>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>>> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
>>>> 
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>>>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> R-1051 mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
>>> 
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> R-1051 mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this 
>> email
>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-1051 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-1051 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
R-1051 mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html