[R-1051] Oven Bridge Resistor

paul swed paulswedb at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 11:10:38 EDT 2012


Indeed how I wanted a AN/urq10. Accept those nasty forever over charged
nicads.
Had replace quite a few packs in my time. Though I will say those batteries
were of far superior build then todays junk. I actually have several that
are 30 years and still working quite well.

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Nick England <navy.radio at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's essentially how R-1051's were used in real life. A master
> shipboard freq standard signal was distributed to the receivers,
> transmitters, etc.
> http://www.navy-radio.com/freq/freq-dist-01.JPG
>
> Initially the freq standard was AN/URQ-9, then later AN/URQ-10, highly
> stable quartz oscillators along with a VLF comparator - I believe
> replaced by cesium beam standards (O-1824A/U) later.
> http://www.navy-radio.com/freq-equip.htm
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:04 AM, paul swed <paulswedb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Crazy thought run it from an external 5 Mhz ref and leave the oven off.
> > I run mine from a GPS referenced RB standard. I know crazy but its always
> > accurate and no oven issue.
> > They were actually pretty poor even when they operated correctly. I
> think 1
> > X 10-7.
> > Regards
> > Paul.
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> R-1051 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/r-1051
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:R-1051 at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>


More information about the R-1051 mailing list