[R-1051] Frequency Standard: Voltage Regulator History Research

David Wise David_Wise at Phoenix.com
Tue Aug 14 17:15:36 EDT 2012


Thanks, Bob.  Having seen them, you're already ahead of me!
I hope that someone feels like getting
into it and comparing notes sometime.

Dave 

PS - I was able to stand my 820-ohm resistor off the board a bit,
to reduce the burn rate - to zero, I hope.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
>[mailto:r-1051-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob Camp
>Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 2:06 PM
>To: R-1051 Discussion Group
>Subject: Re: [R-1051] Frequency Standard: Voltage Regulator 
>History Research
>
>Hi
>
>There are at least two frequency standards made strictly as 
>replacement parts in addition to the ones on your list. I've 
>only seen them briefly and have no detailed data on them. As I 
>recall their performance was not as good as the OEM parts.
>
>Bob
> 
>On Aug 10, 2012, at 4:37 PM, David Wise <David_Wise at Phoenix.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm aware of five different Frequency Standards.
>> Here they are, with salient features, in the order I think 
>they were designed.
>> I'd like to hear comments, corrections, addtions, 
>disagreement, whatever.


More information about the R-1051 mailing list