[QCWA] membership

[Jeffrey D Angus]

On 1/10/2013 7:49 PM, "name withheld" wrote:
> Roske's elevated opinion of himself from his pulpit is the "coronation". And, as a QCWA life member, I suggest that this is not of your personal interest.  I will post where and when I wish.  I welcome free discussion on all aspects of QCWA. You, on the other hand, seem to feel otherwise.  BTW, "Angus"??? Too much bull for me.
I need to address this.

First off, I too am a QCWA Lifer, I also qualify for the OOTC and belong
to the ARRL.

Secondly, and this may come as a surprise to you, but not everyone
hates the President of the United States, nor do they have issues
with the fact that he's "not white" even if they disagree with him.

I don't recall "politics" or "political opinions" as being part of the
charter for the QCWA, nor is it germane to the operation of the
QCWA.

This also applies to the person earlier with the "Change" comment
they snuck in.

As far as your opinion of Roske is concerned, that's between you
and him. You're right, you have every right to voice an opinion
of Roske IF it pertains to QCWA business. Just as the rest of us
have every right to agree or disagree with you

Lastly, if using an ad hominem attack based on my name is the best
you can come up with, we're through discussing anything with you.
At least I do NOT hide behind a pseudonym.

Jeff-1.0
wa6fwi