[QCWA] How human communications fail

[Howard Cunningham]

Jeff

I think that you got it backwards.  It makes more sense when written as:

You ARE responsible for what you say.  You are NOT responsible for how it is interpreted.

WD5DBC


Howard Cunningham, MCP
howardc at macrollc.com - personal
For technical support, send an email to service at macrollc.com or call 703-359-9211 (24/7)


-----Original Message-----
From: qcwa-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:qcwa-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey D Angus
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:11 AM
To: qcwa at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [QCWA] How human communications fail

Back in the late '60s we had a motivational speaker show up at our high school.

One of the things he stated was, "You are NOT responsible for what you say. You ARE responsible for how it is interpreted."

That puts an interesting spin on communications.

Jeff-1.0
wa6fwi

______________________________________________________________
QCWA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html