[QCWA] improving QCWA

[Richard]

Yes that is what I meant. I find the Journal somewhat informative on what 
other chapters are doing.  As far as complaining about its content, I wont, 
because I know I could not do better. I belong to it just for the simple 
fact I could as I had the time, also belong to the old old timers club. they 
also have a small newsletter that come out. you certainly would not like 
that one, due to the fact that there is a lot of WWII and CW articles in it. 
And I do enjoy those. I would say, most of us grew up from our Novice 
station and used CW almost all the time. even when I did upgrade I still did 
not use the Mic. it took me a while to do that. We are all different.  there 
are different organizations out there for everyone, when you find one you 
like, you join.
Rich
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Angus" <jangus at socal.rr.com>
To: "Discussion of QCWA or Ham Radio" <qcwa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [QCWA] improving QCWA


> "walt qcwa" <n3wsqcwa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking forward to your next article Jeff
>>
>> 73
>>
>> walt supina N3WS
>
> "Richard" <wd6fdd at cox.net> wrote:
>> I also agree..
>> Rich
>
> I assume you mean some article for the QCWA Journal and
> more to the point, with regards to what I said was missing.
>
> Tell ya what, I'll do just that, I'll submit it, and when it's
> ready, I'll post  it here as well as a "bonus" sneak peak
> for those of you here on the reflector.
>
> Jeff-1.0
> wa6fwi
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net