[Fwd: Re: [QCWA] computer voting]

[Vernon Fix]

Hi,  I would agree. 

All kinds of procedural questions arise.  Do we top post, or do we post 
at the end.  Or maybe we post both ways to confuse the unwary.  You'd 
think we could shorten the  message a bit after the 3rd or 4th forward.  
Wouldn't hurt since everyone has read that thread to that point.  Oh but 
then there is always the guy that changes the subject and starts a new 
thread.  Hmmm.  Maybe we should all top-post and delete 1/2 the message 
after each 4th post???  Where is Bill Gates when we need him.

The other sticking point with me is the plastering of email addresses 
all over the web and/or world.  You'd think by now that all our email 
experts would know how to use "bcc:" thereby hiding the email addresses 
from Spammers worldwide.  Not so!
Oh well :-P
Vernon, w4thn


n1baa at comcast.net wrote:
> Amen!
> ------Original Message------
> From: Henry Schickler
> Sender: qcwa-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> To: qcwa at mailman.qth.net
> ReplyTo: Discussion of QCWA or Ham Radio
> Sent: Jul 26, 2008 10:14
> Subject: [QCWA] computer voting
>
> You all must be kidding.
>
> Most of you don't know how to use E-mail. You send things back with every message repeated over and over again. What a job scrolling thru all that stuuff.
>
> Hank W2ICW  #2496 since 1962 and a ham since 1935
> ______________________________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> ______________________________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:QCWA at mailman.qth.net
>
>