[Qcwa] Joining QCWA

[Dick Thompson]

You obviously didn't read my explaination that the comment that got out on
the reflector wasn't meant to be.

If you have been licensed since'67 and not a member, may I ask why?

I had planned on joing at the Dayton Hamvention a couple of weeks ago, but
when Frank and I were supposed to be going to Dayton from here in Colorado
Springs (He was to fly in from CA), he cancelled the trip, lost money on the
airline tickets.  In the meantime, I was on the operating table having a
triple bypass.

If this is your reason for not joining, well, what can I say....  I am also
curious why you are a member of the QCWA reflector if you have no intention
to join the QCWA.  Seems like a waste of time to me.  As for me, I will be
joining.  I just hope that those who are quick to condemn Frank for a
personal poke at me will see fit to get off his case and recognize the fact
that he didn't check the TO box in his e-mail program.

He has apologized to the reflector and that should be enough.
73,

Dick
WB0DUL
All incoming and outgoing e-mail is scanned by Norton Anti-Virus





----- Original Message ----- 
From: " Gerry W3GER" <w3ger at arrl.net>
To: "Discussion of QCWA" <qcwa at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Qcwa] Joining QCWA


> You remind me of why I conjure the phrase
> Quick-to-Criticize-and-Whine association,
> and why I do not join.
>
> W3GER, licensed since '67 but not a member
>
> > In a message dated 5/23/2004 12:32:31 PM Pacific Daylight
> Time,
> > wb0dul at wb0dul.com writes:
> >
> > > not have to mail in an application
> >
> > Good grief, I'll GIVE you the gd 37 cents!
> _______________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> QCWA at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
>
>