[Qcwa] CW POLL

Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:01:13 -0500

Norm,

The problem with any poll is that only those that are passionate about it
will respond to the question.  That alone will make any poll that request
a response not valid.

Of course we could call 100 registered QCWA members and frame the
question in such a way that we get the answer we are looking for like
the news media does it and call that scientific :-).

Have A Great Day,

Dan N0DT

At 08:48 AM 7/25/2003 -0400, Norm Gertz wrote:

>Dan....remember....you only polled those who are computer equipped.....there
>are thousands who do not have a computer......a better response would be
>from something placed in the QCWA Journal?
>
>73    Norm    K1AA
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dan Copeland" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:19 PM
>Subject: [Qcwa] CW POLL
>
>
> > Well I have tallied the votes and it was just the opposite of what I
>expected.
> > I would figure that a group of hams that have been used to the CW
>requirement
> > would want to keep it but that is not the case.  The results are:
> >
> > 56% for dropping the CW requirement
> > 44% for keeping it.
> >
> > 73's
> >
> > Dan N0DT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > QCWA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>QCWA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa