[Qcwa] ARRL Membership Numbers

Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:15:06 -0700

The question is should the Amateur service stay as it was in 1910 or 1920 or
1930 or ..............?  When were the requirements EXACTLY RIGHT as they
have continued to change, as all things do.

73 - Ron K8HSF

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Gregory W. Moore
Sent: September 02, 2002 5:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Qcwa] ARRL Membership Numbers

    The Amateur service should have stayed as it was, with the
requirements as they were, and those tested should have to prove their
competency in theory to encompass what is considered obsolete, because,
when one really gets down to the fact, it isn't obsolete at all, it is a
lifesaver.
73 de Greg WA3IVX
QCWA 31578

If anyone knows of a chapter in the suburban Philly area, let me know. I
live in Upper Darby, just West of the city, and would like to be a part
of a QCWA chapter.

"L. S. Staples" wrote:

> Does anyone know the membership numbers for ARRL? Is it growing or
> shrinking?
>
> Is the amateur radio service in trouble?
>
> Larry (W0AIB)
> _______________________________________________
> QCWA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa

_______________________________________________
QCWA mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qcwa