[Qcwa] Fw: ARLX003 Florida Man convicted of deliberate interference, unl...

Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:12:46 EDT

In a message dated 6/21/02 11:13:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

<< What I would like to know, in this case, is why the judge said these
 charges were misdemeanors. Seems to me violations of the basic
 Communications Act at felonies. Can some legal eagle please explain?
 Harvey/W4TG
  >>

The judge did not sat they were misdemeanors.  He was INDICTED on misdemeanor 
counts.  That is based on FEDERAL LAW.  Its not open to interpertation by the 
judge; the proecutor, the jury, you or me.