[Qcwa] CW
W2AGN
[email protected]
Sat, 06 Jul 2002 08:34:23 -0400
On 6 Jul 2002 at 11:14, Robert Harvey wrote:
>
>
> Gentlemen:
>
> It seems to me that the only people I ever hear complain about
> CW are those who aren't proficient at it. Their bitterness over this
> lack of skill seems to color all they say.
>
> For my money, it's not whether the CW requirement outweighs the
> Technical exam, it's a sign that we, too, are heading into a cycle of
> "dumbing down" which every other part of our culture is now experiencing
> (with some few exceptions).
>
> Don't like the SAT? Claim it's biased against
> minorities/females/the disadvantaged/recent immigrants. Military boot
> camp too hard? Separate requirements for Women so they can't fail.
> Medical/law school admissions tests too hard? Separate requirements and
> lower required scores for the "disadvantaged". CW requirement for the
> Extra Class exam too difficult? KEEP the exam, but lower the required
> speed to a level which the majority already have, and make the exam
> multiple-choice so that any fool can figure out the letters they missed.
<snip>
BRAVO! Well said!
--
_ _ _ _ _
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke
( W )( 2 )( A )( G )( N ) http://www.w2agn.net
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ ARCI, NJQRP, ARQrp,GQRP,RSGB
Ex- K3HLU, W7JEF, W4MPC, N4JS