[PVRCNC] [PVRC] WW rules interpretation?

Jim K4QPL k4qpl2 at nc.rr.com
Fri Nov 23 08:57:49 EST 2018


Thanks, Tim. Didn’t check the FAQ’s. Thanks also  Rich and Dave. That’s what I’ll do.

73 and GL to all.

 

From: Tim Shoppa [mailto:tshoppa at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 8:49 AM
To: Jim K4QPL <k4qpl2 at nc.rr.com>
Cc: pvrc at mailman.qth.net; pvrcnc at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [PVRC] WW rules interpretation?

 

Yes, this is specifically permitted in the CQ WW FAQ. It would be poor sportsmanship to spot your own multi-op, though.

 

Q: Can an operator of a multi-op station also work the contest from their home station and submit an entry?

Yes, it is permitted for an operator to work from home with his own callsign and then also from a multi-operator station.

 

Tim N3QE


On Nov 23, 2018, at 8:23 AM, Jim K4QPL <k4qpl2 at nc.rr.com <mailto:k4qpl2 at nc.rr.com> > wrote:

Can I operate from NC as K4QPL for a few hours tonight and then tomorrow from VP5 as single operator “classic” overlay of VP5M?
Can’t see anything relevant in the rules but don’t want to either waste my time or have a DQ. And what about contributing to club scores?
Anyone done it before or see a problem?
73,
Jim K4QPL/VP5M 

Sent from my iPhone
______________________________________________________________
PVRC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:PVRC at mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to tshoppa at gmail.com <mailto:tshoppa at gmail.com> 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the PVRCNC mailing list