[PVRCNC] Re: [PVRC] Preliminary Analysis of CW SS Scores Data for Clubs

[Pete Smith]

One of the more useful innovations that Anthony, WM3T, has brought to the 
5M pages is a function that will tell anyone who wants to know which 
members of a given chapter have not submitted any scores for the club in 
the last year or two.

At 06:59 AM 3/18/2005, Jim Jordan K4QPL wrote:

>I think the important measure of a CONTESTING club is the % of members who
>participate and submit logs in the year's premier status contest.  At a
>rough estimate of about 20% for PVRC, maybe we should change our name to the
>"Potomac Valley Internet Ragchewing and Social Club."
>
>See you in SS 2005!
>
>73,
>
>Jim, K4QPL
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Alterman" <peter_alterman at hotmail.com>
>To: <pvrc at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:23 PM
>Subject: [PVRC] Preliminary Analysis of CW SS Scores Data for Clubs
>
>
> > I didn't see anything in the web report of the CW SS about how the club
> > competition went, so I downloaded the results and did a little analysis of
> > the data.  According to these (admittedly not double-checked) data,
>results
> > were:
> >
> > Club                                          Score             Nr Stns
>Avg
> > Score
> > Northern California Contest Club 9,490,760 120     79,090
> > Society of Midwest Contesters        6,071,368       103    58,945
> > Potomac Valley Radio Club          5,267,268    66       79,807
> > Yankee Clipper Contest Club         3,265,804   49      66,649
> > Minnesota Wireless Assn                   3,193,334     51        62,614
> > Mad River Radio Club                     2,344,502       31 75,629
> > Tennessee Contest Group                1,913,940 22     86,997
> > Frankford Radio Club                     1,912,672       24   79,695
> > Southern California Contest Club 1,726,542   21      82,216
> > South East Contest Club                  1,485,428     18       82,524
> >
> >
> > In addition, I ran the following numbers
> >
> > Club                                      Nr > 200k Nr < 200k > 100k % >
> > 100k
> > Northern California Contest Club 0                   46                38%
> > Society of Midwest Contesters        1                  23
>23%
> > Potomac Valley Radio Club          0                    25
> > 38%
> > Yankee Clipper Contest Club         2                     9
> > 22%
> > Minnesota Wireless Assn                   0                     14
> >         27%
> > Mad River Radio Club                     0                         9
> >      29%
> > Tennessee Contest Group                0                    8
> > 36%
> > Frankford Radio Club                     0                         8
> >      33%
> > Southern California Contest Club 3                     5
>38%
> > South East Contest Club                  0                      7
> >         39%
> >
> > I ran the numbers for all the clubs with 2 or more entries but only worked
> > with the top 10 this first time.  A few things stand out: NCCC won going
> > away in all categories except number of stations with over 200k points.  I
> > see three "classes" based on numbers of entrants, large was NCCC and SMC,
> > medium was PVRC, YCCC and MWA and then the "smaller" big clubs.  It's
>pretty
> > clear that NCCC has a large number of very high-scoring stations and it's
> > also pretty clear that SMC racked up the points by sheer brute force, two
> > very effective strategies and proof that there's no substitute for
> > participation.
> >
> > Be interesting to compare these data to equivalent data from the Phone SS.
> >
> > 73,  Peter W2CDO
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PVRC mailing list
> > PVRC at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrc
>
>_______________________________________________
>PVRC mailing list
>PVRC at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrc