[PVRCNC] Jan/Feb NCJ
Pete Soper
pete at soper.us
Wed Dec 14 10:33:17 EST 2005
Two things to add to this. Brian's example was for European DX with 80
meters and for that a specific set of arrival/takeoff angles are
important ("most of the time", as it's statistical of course). So what
I've been doing is to focus on the differences between antennas within
the range of "angles of interest." There are also "angles of extreme
disinterest", so a huge difference between the 80m dipole or yagi
relatively low to the ground is that there is a great deal of gain for
high angle signals. For other antenna types there may be very low gain
for high angles. So this means while you're trying to pick out the
European station there may be very loud "local" signals with one antenna
that are much quieter with the other antenna. So I guess this is a kind
of signal to noise figure of merit, where we define noise in this
particular case as "Joe and Bubba in Georgia discussing whatever."
Amen to Howie's bandwidth observation. The trouble with some of the
"clever' wire antennas I've been studying is their bandwidth is unusable
for contesting on 80.
I still have a coax stub for 15 meters that I used with that old Russian
amateur satellite that transmitted on 10 and received on 15. Putting the
15 meter stub inline with a receiver on 10 meters allowed listening
while simultaneously transmitting on 15. It attenuated the 15m signal
maybe 30-40db, enough to avoid blowing out the 10m receiver's front end.
The sharpness of attenuation is directly related to the loss of the
coax, so I guess a little piece of hardline would make the best filter.
I worked out a very interesting design recently that puts a 40 meter
bobtail curtain inside an 80 meter halfsqure. I was amazed to find very
little interaction, so this combo would play nicely together, according
to eznec. I've managed to get a rope at 100' and am working on a second
one at 75' and this would be perfect for this set of wires, exactly
broadside to you know where for DX contests from this area.
Then I thought of the people factors. I was OK for safety, as the high
potential ends of the elements hanging down wouldn't be closer than
maybe 12 feet up and the current maximums were all so far from the
ground I figure field strength isn't an issue. But these two sets of
wires would be over the front of my house and one mental image of the
appearance in daylight made me realize neither Jenny or I would be happy
with it. But according to eznec it would have been *killer* for DX. :-)
So I'm falling back and regrouping and putting a 40/80 trapped dipole on
the 100' end of the span while thinking what else I can do and looking
for more out of the way trees. Of course wire on 80, even near 100', is
much more of a local antenna and would be a good example of bad "DX
signal to local noise" ratio. But we make the best of what we have.
-Pete
More information about the PVRCNC
mailing list