[PVRCNC] Meeting location change?

[Guy Olinger, K2AV]

Jeff, not intended that way. No nerves here. I have no attachment to
Ryan's other than it meets 1-8.

These discussions have surfaced before. The task broke down because
1-8 eventually surfaces as everyone thinks about them. This is just a
way to put where we always finally get to out in front.

There isn't any magic momma to go find another place for us, the GROUP
has to go sniffing around and find someplace that is otherwise located
that takes care of 1-8. If we go there and 1-8 isn't taken care of,
we'll just wind up looking for another place, again.

73


----- Original Message -----
From: <NX9T@aol.com>
To: <pvrcnc@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [PVRCNC] Meeting location change?


> While it has been stated that my approach was ineffective...let me
state that I disagree totally.  Obviously there is a list of at least
8 points that have been laid out which must be addressed before any
change would even be considered for table discussion.  How would I
have known to cover all 8?  That is one reason no leg work was done
initially. In my way of thinking...if I had contacted "9" places and
was not aware of a particular requirement I'd be right back there
again. Also, if for whatever reason...there is resistance to this
concept of change... why waste my time pursuing it.  If the majority
prefers to stay at Crossroads that is fine and discussion can cease.
But, since I have never heard this issue come up in any serious
discussion, thought I'd throw it out on the table.
>
> We obviously have limitations on where we can meet. No question
about that.
>
> So, enough said.  If there is interest fine.  If the status quo is
preferred...fine again.
>
> No group of any value grows or adds any value unless it is open to
ideas and change.  That is merely what is being attempted in this
little "brainstorm session".
>
> However, as stated earlier...even IF someone(myself or another) came
forward with a location that met all the requirements as listed in 1-8
of Guy's email....if the group would STILL not want to change
locations..why even spend the time that Guy has already stated as
being very hard work and time consuming finding a particular site?
That my friends would seem to me as being ineffective.
>
> I have not meant to either critize or hit a nerve with anyone on
this.  It was merely an idea surfaced.
>
> 73,
> Jeff NX9T
> _______________________________________________
> PVRCNC mailing list
> PVRCNC@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrcnc
>