[PVRCNC] Meeting location change?

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:06:28 -0400

I too would support a weekend meeting out west. Also, wouldn't mind the trek
to Burlington now and then, either.

Gary W2CS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jim Price WW4M
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:34 AM
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PVRCNC] Meeting location change?
>
>
> I like the idea of a change.  I'm getting tired of Ryan's, too.  I know
> Guy feels it's important that when we pick a place we stick with it for a
> while so people who don't attend regularly or might be visiting from out
> of town are able to find us on the 1st Thursday of the month, so if we
> decide to move we should plan on staying with the new place for a while.
>
> For the reason above it's probably not wise to have meeting locations
> alternate between Greensboro/W-S and the Triangle.  However, if the
> PVRC/NC-West folks had occasional meetings I'd make the trip to attend (I
> have to work until 6:10 weekdays, so would prefer weekends -- how about
> quarterly breakfast meetings out west?).
>
> 73, Jim WW4M
>
>
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > While it has been stated that my approach was ineffective...let
> me state that I disagree totally.  Obviously there is a list of
> at least 8 points that have been laid out which must be addressed
> before any change would even be considered for table discussion.
> How would I have known to cover all 8?  That is one reason no leg
> work was done initially. In my way of thinking...if I had
> contacted "9" places and was not aware of a particular
> requirement I'd be right back there again. Also, if for whatever
> reason...there is resistance to this concept of change... why
> waste my time pursuing it.  If the majority prefers to stay at
> Crossroads that is fine and discussion can cease.  But, since I
> have never heard this issue come up in any serious discussion,
> thought I'd throw it out on the table.
> >
> > We obviously have limitations on where we can meet. No question
> about that.
> >
> > So, enough said.  If there is interest fine.  If the status quo
> is preferred...fine again.
> >
> > No group of any value grows or adds any value unless it is open
> to ideas and change.  That is merely what is being attempted in
> this little "brainstorm session".
> >
> > However, as stated earlier...even IF someone(myself or another)
> came forward with a location that met all the requirements as
> listed in 1-8 of Guy's email....if the group would STILL not want
> to change locations..why even spend the time that Guy has already
> stated as being very hard work and time consuming finding a
> particular site?  That my friends would seem to me as being ineffective.
> >
> > I have not meant to either critize or hit a nerve with anyone
> on this.  It was merely an idea surfaced.
> >
> > 73,
> > Jeff NX9T
> > _______________________________________________
> > PVRCNC mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrcnc
> _______________________________________________
> PVRCNC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrcnc
>