[PVRCNC] More bad SS statistics
alsopb
[email protected]
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 13:08:14 +0000
Guys,
To provide an alternate analysis of whether assisted helps or hurts, I
submit the following analysis.
1. Data set - the most recently published 2002 CW SS results #3
2. Data included:
For assisted-- all stations
For SO -- all class B stations
3. Comparison method: compute mean and standard deviation
4. Hypothesis to be tested-- On the average assisted operation
improves scores.
Suffers from the following inadequacies. No control group
established. Sampling is questionable. Not all U stations may have
been high power-- thus the affect of power is possibly a confounding
factor.
Results: SO mean = 97103 standard deviation 48752 20 data points
mean =101639 standard deviation 45719 (ignoring the
one 10K outlier)
Results: SOA mean = 129218 standard deviation 39816 11 data
points.
Just comparing the means shows a benefit of over 30% for packet. If
one also considers the standard deviations, one can't conclude
anything. The distributions are just too scattered.
Note: If one were to include A stations in the SO results, the mean
would have been even lower.
73 de Brian/K3KO