[PVRCNC] cut numbers

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:53:20 -0500

Brian, the cut numbers are just a "new code"... surely you're up to some
"morse modifications, no?"    :-))))

I'd hate to see cut nums required.  Then we'd be forced to copy the 599 vs
5NN instead of just letting TR do its thing. Gosh, we'd have to COPY
something.

I'm one of those who would like to see RST eliminated or replaced by
something non repetitive such as SIX-character grid square.  Now that's
masochistic, eh?

73,

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of alsopb
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:49 AM
> To: PVRCNC
> Subject: [PVRCNC] cut numbers
>
>
> Guys,
>
> I wonder if the log checkers are ever going to get real picky and
> start disqualifying logs which don't log cut numbers as they are
> sent.  For example, 5nneee logged as 599111 would be DQ'd.  On the
> other hand, I wonder if logs which enter the cut numbers as send would
> be accepted.
>
> I'm not familiar with TR-LOG but it seems to me it would be useful if
> this cut number to real number conversion were handled automatically
> when an exchange is entered. Neither CT nor NA does this. I've been
> thinking of just typing in the cut numbers and post processing the
> Cabrillo file to do the conversion.  Frankly, doing the conversion
> during logging really seems to slow me up.
>
> 73 de Brian/K3KO
> _______________________________________________
> PVRCNC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pvrcnc
>