[Premium-Rx] Fw: Racal 177x PSU
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Mon Aug 9 19:13:12 EDT 2010
In a message dated 09/08/2010 22:30:51 GMT Daylight Time,
michaelob666 at ntlworld.com writes:
> I suggest that some of Nigel's comments are a little harsh. There was
in
> fact quite a time span between the last of the valved gear (typically
the
> RA17) and the RA1772. There were the rather poor performing RA217
series
> in between, though I suspect that their problems were more the trouble
of
> early transistors rather than of inherent design defects.
----------------------
Hi Michael
I'm sorry but I don't think my comments were particularly harsh so much as
just being realistic.
As I said earlier I don't dispute Racal's technical excellence when it
comes to the 17xx series but there must have been something adrift with their
production engineering at that time.
Although the 217/1217 series was indeed the immediate unfortunate attempt
to produce a solid state RA17, the mindset still seems to have been well
and truly stuck in valve age production techniques when engineering the 17xx.
That there was quite such a time span between the RA17 and 1772 only
serves to indicate just how far the Racal head was buried in the sand.
That wiring harness might have been "a thing of beauty", just as any
complex cableform might seem in its uninstalled, or even installed, state, but
the 17XX series construction techniques were archaic in comparison with
other contemporary manufacturers of professional receivers.
The Redifon R1001 I mentioned previously was far more typical of good
production engineering of that period, high quality fibreglass circuit boards,
chassis mounted connectors for all the control and supply wiring with well
organised fixed wiring beneath the chassis, and separate coaxial links
topsides for all RF and signal interconnects.
Watkins johnson was building the Quad8 and Quad8B at this same time and
even the Marconi ICS3 hails from the same period.
Racal, for whatever reason, was churning out SRBP circuit boards on the
17xx series, a nice touch of domestic radio thinking here, with that
wonderful hinged arrangement and everything hard wired to pins along the edges of
the PCBs and all routed through one big fat umbilical cable.
What's really sad is not that they couldn't have foreseen the cableform
cooking and deteriorating but that they decided on this form of construction
in the first place.
And, no, I'm not given to Racal bashing, despite what it might sound
like:-), and in other respects I was once as great a fan of the 17xx, especially
of the 1784 and variants, as anyone could be.
Technically it was excellent, perhaps not too surprising given Danny's
account of the setting up procedure:-), ergonomically it was very nice to use,
but internally it was not at all well engineered and my enthusiasm waned.
I accept that I'm probably out of step with much of the rest of the radio
world, but this does not rank as one of my favourites.
regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list