[Premium-Rx] Racal RA1772
LaverdaOrange
machine.age at comcast.net
Sun Aug 8 19:49:17 EDT 2010
Hello All
I had a good suspicion that Pat G3YFK could not resist throwing in some sage commentary on this subject!!
And rightly so, as Pat is too modest but I will say without hesitation he has forgotten more than most of us will ever know about this era of Racal receivers.
I was lucky enough to have Pat go through several of my radios many moons ago much to my delight.
I was a dumb cluck and passed on a nice RA1784 some years ago---but as most of this list knows, I am pretty much out of the HF game after 40+ active years, but I sure remember all the jollies I had with this gear.
Lastly, if I had just one only Racal RX to listen too, reliably, and still easily available, it would be the 1772 .
John England
San Jose, California
On Aug 8, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Pat1McA at aol.com wrote:
> Hello Alberto,
>
> After repairing over 20 RA1772s and over 45 RA1792s I think that I can
> comment on this subject.
>
> The RA1772 appears to have been designed, at the time, with little regard
> for cost saving.
> There is a reason for this. After the valve/tubed RA17 receiver, Racal was
> struggling to produce a comparable solid state successor, in the event they
> produced the transistorised RA1217 - which turned out to be a disaster in
> terms of performance.
> I remember visiting Portishead Radio, in those days GRL (1612kHz), but
> later as GKA/B etc, around 1969, when they had replaced the RA17s with RA1217s
> and the Operators were NOT happy at all !
> The general performance was so dreadful that Racal just had to come up with
> a satisfactory replacement.
> Enter the RA1772 which was designed from the floor up with no short cuts.
> The result was a truly superb receiver.
> Consider at the same time competition was fierce from Marconi, Redifon,
> Plessey, Rohde & Schwarz, Telefunken etc etc, remember this was in the era
> of "Real" HF CW and voice SSB Communications. WJ did not get a look in, not
> at least on this side of the "Pond!"
>
> The thing that sets the RA177X series apart from the others is the very low
> noise synthesiser with discreet crystal filters, this is basically superb
> and the excellent rotary Tuning shaft encoder is copied right up to the
> later RA3701 model. Unfortunately the RA1772 "hang" type agc lets it down -
> for Amateur use.
>
> The RA177X series had a useable Preamplifier that would show signals down
> to -139dBm with a 3Ip of around +35dBm. This was seriously good in 1974, it
> still is now! Most other receivers of the time, the EK070, E1700, and later
> E1800 did not have a preamp and consequently had impressive 3Ip figures.
> But, under most common circumstances this does not matter at all for us
> Amateurs.
>
> The RA1772 was unbelieveably and expensively labour intensive, rather like
> the E1500/1700. Even worse for wiring intensity was the RA1784 and
> RA1778/9 series. So the RA1792 was born, a beancounters dream!
>
> I think that there is no comparison between a properly aligned (few were)
> RA1772 and an RA1792. The RA1772 wins hands down BUT from the operational
> point of view the RA1792 is absolutely unbeatable!!!
> The later RA1778/9 series is nicer to use than the RA1772 but much harder
> to find now.
>
> For my choice the finest Racal HF Receiver is the Remote Controlled RA1784.
> These were hugely expensive but had the option of a switchable 600Hz
> Roofing Filter in them, rather like the RA1772 prototype I was offered many
> years ago,and, like an idiot, did not purchase! That had a switch, in place of
> the normal AFC one that switched in an Optional CW Roofing Filter - an
> Option that got dropped by Racal as being too expensive at the time, around
> £600 in 19772.
>
> If you compare an RA1772 against an RA1792 on the bench the RA1772 wins
> easily on readability but then, as usual, everything is " Horses for Courses"
> with the 1792 being much more intuitive to use, but (I believe) it was an
> American design based on the RA6790GM. For intuitiveness and ease of
> operation nothing beats American Radios eg. WJ8711A , WJ8718, etc etc
>
> Regards & 73
>
> Pat G3YFK
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Premium-Rx mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/premium-rx
> Help Page: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Premium-Rx at mailman.qth.net
> Help Contact eMail: paul at 8zo.com
> Home Page: http://www.premium-rx.org/
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list