[Premium-Rx] Preselectors
Michael O'Beirne
michaelob666 at ntlworld.com
Sat Dec 1 11:51:14 EST 2007
Evening All,
Most of us fortunately don't live next door to a big Tx and have no need for
preselectors but when you do they are essential. I have three examples for
you.
1. When I did military things we usually had to run full duplex HF FSK
nets from tactical locations with a frequency separation of about 300kHz and
an antenna separation of 20 to 100 feet and with 300 watts pumping out
continuously from the Tx. At very close antenna separations it was
essential to use the external Marconi passive preselector to back up the
internal tuned circuits in the Rx.
2. Some stations in LandRovers (using tactical SSB transceivers) ran two
HF nets with about 30 - 40W PEP output using whip antennas mounted on each
side of the vehicle and separated by 6 - 7 feet. This was only possible if
both sets used external passive Rx preselectors, which also acted
simultaneously as Tx postselectors, and a frequency separation of 20% or
more. This unit - the Clansman "SURF" - is now being sold off surplus in
the UK as the Army is migrating to the new Bowman system and they are
absolutely excellent. I measured the tuned loss in my one at under 1dB and
the ultimate selectivity at over 70dB. They are fully sealed, have
silver-plated inductors and gold-plated piston trimmers. Original cost? I
dare not think.
2. A pro told me a couple of years back that he worked at a large Air
Traffic Control centre near London where his building was stuffed full of
QRM-producing computers. They had to monitor a particular HF channel for
which they used an old Eddystone 958 (which has 3 tuned circuits before the
1st mixer). After 20 years or so they needed a replacement. None of the
new "PR" type receivers trialled were any good at that location until he
tested a JRC NRD-535, which (to his considerable surprise) worked very well
and was a lot cheaper. He reckons the internal preselector was doing its
stuff in reducing the unusually high level of wideband QRM to a level
acceptable to the 1st mixer.
73s
Michael
G8MOB
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list