[Premium-Rx] Wanted: Eddystone 1650 HF/LF Receiver
GandalfG8 at aol.com
GandalfG8 at aol.com
Sun Sep 2 14:08:59 EDT 2007
In a message dated 02/09/2007 16:49:12 GMT Daylight Time,
w4nj at tampabay.rr.com writes:
Additionally, if anyone has any comprehensive info on converting the 1650/6
Remote version for local use, adding VFO, speaker etc, I'd love to hear from
you!
-----------------------------------
Hi Cliff
Geoff Steedman in the UK was modifying these sets a few years back and did
provide comprehensive notes at one time. I also recall parts, including the
VFO encoder, being available from somebody in Holland.
Unfortunately, I can't find contact details for either right now and the
printed notes that I had from Geoff are buried somewhere in storage.
Whilst the 1650/6 could be, and probably still can be, had much more cheaply
than a "proper" version, there's a fair bit of conversion work involved and
the end result will never match something like the 1650/9.
Although provision of variable tuning is not too difficult, I'm pretty sure
it's only the rotary encoder that's lacking, it's not just the obvious things
such as VFO and speaker that need sorting,
New firmware is required , and there's some significant issues with IF
filtering and demodulation.
For example there's only two crystal filters and no space for more, neither
on the PCB nor on the membrane switch front panel, which leaves you with
bandwidths of 3, 8, or 16 KHz, the latter being from the roofing filter.
There also seems to be some form of mod required to enable AM/SSB switching,
even though the switch positions are already included on the panel.
Some of the normally fitted rear panel connectors are also missing on the
1650/6.
I've got some internal and external photos of a couple of 1650/6s, one
modified and one not, and also some of a 1650/9.
I can email these to you if you'd like to compare them.
As to the "proper" sets, I prefer the 1650 to the Racal 1792 from the same
period, but my experience has just been of the 1650/9, the first that had
BITE fitted, so I can't really comment on the earlier versions.
Just as with the 1792 though, CPU battery corrosion can be an issue but it's
less easy to spot on the 1650 as the CPU board is under a cover behind the
front panel.
If you can find one with the optional motorised preselctor fitted that would
be one heck of a bonus.
I have seen them but they seem to very rare indeed.
regards
Nigel
GM8PZR
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list