[Premium-Rx] Receiver Selection
Mac McCullough
w5mc at austin.rr.com
Fri Dec 17 21:01:46 EST 2004
only one choice.. tenTec RX-340 it's friendly enough to support these
situations.. esp. 232 .. mac/mc
Located 46 miles due North of the Alamo, and 121 miles due South of the
Western White House. see my website at www.collinsandharrisradios.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "w3jn" <w3jn at direcway.com>
To: "Kevin" <kgreene at echo.cellmail.com>; "Premium Receiver"
<premium-rx at ml.skirrow.org>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Premium-Rx] Receiver Selection
> The Collins 95S would be an ideal receiver for this application. Small,
> easy on the power, and good stability/freq resolution. I believe you can
> buy them in a VXI package as well if you're planning on installing 8 of
> them at one location.
>
> I don;'t know how much they cost now, but 10 years ago they were about $4K
> each - a steal back then.
>
> 73 John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin" <kgreene at echo.cellmail.com>
> To: "Premium Receiver" <premium-rx at ml.skirrow.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Premium-Rx] Receiver Selection
>
>
>> Hi Eugene:
>>
>> Once we get funding, I will create a website - good idea actually. It
>> will need
>> to be password protected but I will share it with the list.
>>
>> Thanks for your mail.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> "Eugene Hertz" wrote at 10:10 pm on Fri, Dec 17 2004:
>>>sounds like a really cool and interesting project. I have the harris
>>>rf-590H
>>>and it is a great radio. Frequency resolution is actually 1Hz ! Very
>>>stable I
>>>think something like 10^-8 per year or something rediculous. Its really
>>>incredibly stable. It has up to 100 channels and can scan them. Radio has
>>>ISB
>>>but I dont know if your application will need that. Would love to learn
>>>more
>>>about this project. Do you plan to create website to document it? sounds
>>>like
>>>fun
>>>Eugene
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Kevin [mailto:kgreene at echo.cellmail.com]
>>>>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 03:43 PM
>>>>To: 'Premium Receiver'
>>>>Subject: [Premium-Rx] Receiver Selection
>>>>
>>>>Hello to the list:
>>>>
>>>>I am working on a potential project where our organization will be
>>>>providing HF
>>>>communication to a number of remote users. The primary mode will be data
>>>>(PACTOR and CLOVER with limited SITOR) and a limited amount of voice
>>>>traffic.
>>>>We are also looking at a limited amount of digital voice and narrow
>>>>bandwidth
>>>>imaging but this is more for the future.
>>>>
>>>>The concern I have is in several areas:
>>>>
>>>>1. Frequency stability within +/- 10 hz (or better)
>>>>2. Receive filter capabilities - need to support PACTOR III, CLOVER
>>>>2000, 188-114B, etc
>>>>3. Power can be 220 VAC or 24 DC
>>>>4. Receiver overload protection
>>>>5. Full remote control using RS-232/422 interface
>>>>
>>>>We are considering the use of high quality antennas with broad bandwidth
>>>>and
>>>>low noise (considering the 8 element HERMES loop system). The receive
>>>>site will
>>>>be a remote location - hopefully miles/km from power lines and roads
>>>>with a
>>>>microwave backhaul to a nearby cellsite to be then linked using our
>>>>fiber
>>>>network to our main control facility. We expect that the receive site
>>>>will need
>>>>to support 8 RF channels (max).
>>>>
>>>>I am looking at three different high performance receivers. The
>>>>Rockwell-Collins RT-2200, Harris R-590A, and the Cubic 2000 series. I
>>>>have also
>>>>looked at the use of the ICOM receivers (R-8500) but I question its
>>>>stability
>>>>(per its web site information). I would welcome suggestions for other
>>>>vendors
>>>>to consider.
>>>>
>>>>While price does come into play, it is not a critical decision factor.
>>>>We are
>>>>more concerned that the financial investment we put into this project
>>>>will
>>>>provide a very high quality system to the end users. As the path lenght
>>>>will be
>>>>long (>4,000 km), we are concerned that the quality we design into the
>>>>system
>>>>will play a key role in its success.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for your help. I am sorry I can not give more information but we
>>>>are
>>>>still in the internal proposal stage and do not wish to give out too
>>>>much
>>>>information at this time. If we get funding, I will provide more
>>>>information.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers.
>>>>
>>>>Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Premium-Rx Mailing List
>>>>To Post: premium-rx at ml.skirrow.org
>>>>For Info: http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/premium-rx
>>>>Visit the Website: http://kahuna.sdsu.edu/~mechtron/PremRxPage/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Premium-Rx Mailing List
>> To Post: premium-rx at ml.skirrow.org
>> For Info: http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/premium-rx
>> Visit the Website: http://kahuna.sdsu.edu/~mechtron/PremRxPage/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Premium-Rx Mailing List
> To Post: premium-rx at ml.skirrow.org
> For Info: http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/premium-rx
> Visit the Website: http://kahuna.sdsu.edu/~mechtron/PremRxPage/
>
More information about the Premium-Rx
mailing list