[Premium-Rx] Premium Reciever specifications

[John B Cundiff Jr]

BlankI believe a specification list by year manufactured ought to be used.

Specifications should get tougher every year like car emission tests get
harder every year.
So an old receiver with poor performance by today's standards could be
premium.
But a new receiver must be state of the art ....nearly anyway.

And the specifications ought to be defined in such a way that even a
home brew  receiver if it met the requirements or specifications could be
considered
a premium receiver and a certificate issued by this group qualifying a
home brew receiver as a premium receiver be issued on a certain date of the
year it was built.


In other words easy methods of testing established so every one could see if
their receiver was actually performing
as a premium or not.

As things are right now if some factory did not build it ...it isn't
premium.
And is not worth anything  if the owner developer / inventor improver
wants to try to get his money back out of it to  invest in his newest
project.

There fore there is not much private innovation or receiver engineering
going on.

Just my opinion ...I may be totally wrong !

Please correct me and enlighten me if you feel I am in error.

John   KA3WSR


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Blank Bkgrd.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 145 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/premium-rx/attachments/20030521/fc84bd8e/BlankBkgrd.gif