[PPRAANet] Fwd: Re: Amateur Radio Safety Foundation, Inc. (ARSFI) Board Files FCC Response to Rappaport Campaign

[Dan Martin]

Here's my filing. Doesn't have to be long or elequent, they just track 
the count. Take your time on the comment website, though, and don't get 
frustrated there. It sure could be easier, but it is doable for anyone 
capable of getting a call sign.

-------- Forwarded Comment --------
On 12/12/2018 12:00 PM, no-reply at fcc.gov wrote:
> Thank you for your submission to the FCC Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).
> Please Note that your filing will not be available for searching until it has been reviewed and posted by the FCC.
>
>   Confirmation Number: 2018121250866408
>
>
> Proceeding(s): 16-239 : Amatuer Baud Rate
>
>
> Filer(s): WT RM-11708, CG RM-11759
>
> Author(s):
>
> Law firm(s):
>
> Type of Filing: COMMENT
>
> File Number:
>
> Report Number:
>
> Bureau ID Number:
>
> Documents(s) Attached: I fully support the ARSFI position with respect to the above proceedings.pdf
>
> Address: 970 Royal Crown Lane , Colorado Springs, CO 80906
-------- End Comment --------

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [PPRAANet] Amateur Radio Safety Foundation, Inc. (ARSFI) 
Board Files FCC Response to Rappaport Campaign
Date: 	Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:18:21 -0700
From: 	Larry Wilkes via PPRAANet <ppraanet at mailman.qth.net>
Reply-To: 	Larry Wilkes <larry.wilkes at yahoo.com>
To: 	John Bloodgood <johnbloodgood at hotmail.com>
CC: 	PPRAA Reflector <ppraanet at mailman.qth.net>



Thanks for this, John!

I thought the response paper filed by Winlink.org was educational and extremely well written; it presents a powerful fact-based rebuttal to Rappaport’s emotion-driven claims.

73,

Larry
K0SDG

Sent from my iPhone

> On 12 Dec 2018, at 10:53, John Bloodgood <johnbloodgood at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> (Speaking personally, wearing only my amateur radio hat, not my ARES or AUXCOMM hat, and not my PPRAA board member hat)
> 
> The Amateur Radio Safety Foundation, Inc. (ARSFI), which is the development and administrating organization for Winlink and other data suites, is asking the FCC to replace the current 300 baud symbol rate limitation on HF to a 2800 Hz spectrum limitation. This would allow the use of higher speed modes on HF (notably PACTOR 4), more experimentation with data modes to advance the art and science of amateur radio.
> 
> A gentleman named Theodore Rappaport has filed comments regarding this to the FCC and some of the things he is talking about could set amateur radio data modes/suites, including FT8, Winlink, Fldigi, WSPR, JT65, APRS, etc. back to the stone age. Worst case, we could end up limited to little more than RTTY.
> 
> The ARSFI has done a good job of countering and dismantling Mr. Rappaport's arguments; however, they could really use the amateur radio community at large to weigh in and show support and demonstrate just how important this is to us.
> 
> The following link will help explain the situation and will give you links to the filings in question. You can read them for yourselves and make up you own mind and if you feel strongly one way or another, you can file comments of your own following the procedures on one of the linked pages.
> 
> https://winlink.org/FCC_Action
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> John Bloodgood, KD0SFY
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> PPRAANet mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ppraanet
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PPRAANet at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
PPRAANet mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ppraanet
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:PPRAANet at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html