[PPRAANet] [GMCC] CO QSO Party question

[Dave]

Steve,
   Doug or someone must have updated the web site tonight before the board meeting. I just got through looking and the 2010 rules are there now. As I remember the first year of the COPQ we had 13 Canadian providences (the same as the ARRL uses). How about it Dick, you were on the committee also, do you remember? Anyway it looks like these will be the rules for 2010.

73,
Dave N0EOP

-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve **KT0DX** <kt0dx at comcast.net>
>Sent: Aug 9, 2010 8:22 PM
>To: DickT-W0RAA <dickt at w0raa.com>, ppraanet at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [PPRAANet] [GMCC] CO QSO Party question
>
>  Hi Dick do you know if anyone answered your e mail from the committee 
>?  I had plans on working the COQP but noticed they still have the rules 
>from last year still up.  I guess if nothing changes in the next week or 
>so I will cross this one off my list of contests to do.
>
>Steve
>
>On 8/9/2010 00:41, DickT-W0RAA wrote:
>> I agree, Jim.  But, if the people on the committee don't answer the question
>> or address a possible problem, then I have a feeling the contest will die.
>> That would be a sad thing to see.  I hope somebody sees these comments and
>> does something about it.
>>
>> Dick
>> W0RAA
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jim Reisert AD1C"<jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
>> To: "DickT-W0RAA"<dickt at w0raa.com>
>> Cc: "PPRAA Reflector"<ppraanet at mailman.qth.net>;<k3ct at verizon.net>;
>> <n2icarrl at gmail.com>; "Grand Mesa Contest Club"<gmc at mailman.qth.net>;
>> "Steve Woodruff"<sjwoodr at yahoo.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 3:23 PM
>> Subject: Re: [GMCC] CO QSO Party question
>>
>>
>>> It's also getting late if loggers like WriteLog etc. have to be changed to
>>> support the new list.
>>>
>>> 73 - Jim AD1C
>>>
>>> On 8/8/2010 2:08 PM, DickT-W0RAA wrote:
>>>> Can somebody on the COQP Committee please answer this query?
>>>>
>>>> I would think that if a question comes in that somebody would answer it.
>>>>
>>>> Letting it go unanswered is a sure way to kill interest in the COQP.
>>>>
>>>> Dick
>>>> W0RAA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Steve London"<n2icarrl at gmail.com>
>>>> To: "'GMC'"<gmc at mailman.qth.net>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 1:34 PM
>>>> Subject: [GMCC] [Fwd: [N1MM] CO QSO Party]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have more info ?
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: [N1MM] CO QSO Party
>>>>> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:46:47 -0400
>>>>> From: John, K3CT<k3ct at verizon.net>
>>>>> Reply-To: N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com
>>>>> To:<N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The CO QSO party changed the VE multiplier list. Does anyone know if
>>>>> anything else changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Email to coqpinfo at ppraa.org has not been answered and last year's rules
>>>>> have been removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please encourage your state coordinators to include this information for
>>>>> the developers and users.
>>>>>
>>>>> John, K3CT
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jim Reisert AD1C,<jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> PPRAANet mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ppraanet
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:PPRAANet at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>______________________________________________________________
>PPRAANet mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ppraanet
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:PPRAANet at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html