[PPRAANet] [GMCC] CO QSO Party question

Jim Reisert AD1C jjreisert at alum.mit.edu
Sun Aug 8 17:23:07 EDT 2010


It's also getting late if loggers like WriteLog etc. have to be changed 
to support the new list.

73 - Jim AD1C

On 8/8/2010 2:08 PM, DickT-W0RAA wrote:
> Can somebody on the COQP Committee please answer this query?
>
> I would think that if a question comes in that somebody would answer it.
>
> Letting it go unanswered is a sure way to kill interest in the COQP.
>
> Dick
> W0RAA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve London"<n2icarrl at gmail.com>
> To: "'GMC'"<gmc at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 1:34 PM
> Subject: [GMCC] [Fwd: [N1MM] CO QSO Party]
>
>
>> Anyone have more info ?
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [N1MM] CO QSO Party
>> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:46:47 -0400
>> From: John, K3CT<k3ct at verizon.net>
>> Reply-To: N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com
>> To:<N1MMLogger at yahoogroups.com>
>>
>>
>> The CO QSO party changed the VE multiplier list. Does anyone know if
>> anything else changed?
>>
>> Email to coqpinfo at ppraa.org has not been answered and last year's rules
>> have been removed.
>>
>> Please encourage your state coordinators to include this information for
>> the developers and users.
>>
>> John, K3CT


-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us


More information about the PPRAANet mailing list