[PCR-1000] Maybe XP can inadvertently corrupt the PCR1000 EEPROM
Jerry Flanders
jeflanders at comcast.net
Fri Jun 17 14:04:33 EDT 2005
I recently ran my TalkPCR verify utility and discovered 109 errors in the
EEPROM. Strange - I don't run any hairy-wild software here. No big deal - I
had a good backup EEPROM copy, so I restored it and noticed signal levels
come back up OK. But I was wondering what could have caused the EEPROM
corruption.
So I started thinking.
Not long ago, I upgraded to XP here, and I remember seeing XP doing tricks
with the serial port at startup. I did a google to see what XP could be
doing, and discovered it is looking for a serial mouse. There is actually a
command to add to the BOOT.INI file to disable this query
"
/fastdetect:comnumber
This switch turns off serial and bus mouse detection in the Ntdetect.com
file for the specified port. Use this switch if you have a component other
than a mouse that is attached to a serial port during the startup process."
The above is from:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;833721
So Microsoft ways that, at startup, XP somehow pulses or queries the serial
ports to see if a serial mouse is attached there.
Perhaps your PCR1000 is at risk of EEPROM corruption when that query is
sent out on the port. The above reference tells us how to kill the serial
port query, if we need to. I am going to leave mine as it is now and see if
anything happens in the future. I mostly leave the present PCR1000 computer
running 24/7, so have few startups to test, but still may see something
happen. (The PCR1000 was on a different XP machine until recently, with
normal startups/shutdowns.)
We have had several cases of EEPROM corruption reported here. Does this
possible XP connection ring a bell with anyone?
Jerry W4UK
More information about the PCR-1000
mailing list