[PCR-1000] ??
R. J. Grasser
rgrasser at frontiernet.net
Thu Jun 2 07:24:45 EDT 2005
You must have a proper ground on the rcvr, and preferably on a UPS
controlled power source. I havent had any problems with the EPROM trashing
itself with this configuration, and this is in the presence of several 100
watt PEP transceivers.
You can de-sense the frontend by putting a preselector on the rcvr, and
simply de-tune it to eliminate any overloads.
A nice little CAT program thats free, is HRD 3.2 authored by Simon Brown.
Its primarily for ham xcvrs, but does support the PCR-1000, as well as the
Ten-Tec RX-350D, andRX-320D receivers.
I have also had "run-ins" with ICOM, over many years. They NEVER
acknowledge their designs could be faulty. For that reason, all my other
"gear" is from Yaesu since as far back as the early 70's. :-)
Regards, RJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "A10382" <a10382 at snet.net>
To: "Discussion of PCR-1000 by Icom" <pcr-1000 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PCR-1000] ??
> Has AOR had any real 'bombs' ??
> All of the AOR receiver models that I've ever used (3 of them) appeared
> to be great radios.
> ---
>
> There have been some very apparent and universal 'problems' with ICOM's
> PCR-1xxx line.
>
> 1) It seems too sensitive to front end overload
> 2) It 'blows' the front end easily (from static ?) that
> other receivers seem to tolerate.
> 3) It seems much too prone to EPROM corruption - possibly from
> errant electrical noise or RF on the serial line and/or from
> mis-completed commands (like crashing or shutting down
> the computer first exiting the ICOM or TalkPCR
> application. This same problem seems to happen with other
> PCR1xxx CAT programs as well.
>
> Other receivers I've used (including a few 'black box' ones) do
> not exhibit these problems. Icom has never recognized them as
> either their design or product problems - frequently faulting (and
> charging) the user to repair the results.
>
> I've spoken with two ICOM USA folks over the years and they both seemed
> somewhat exasperated (frustrated ?) with ICOM Japan's apparent lack of
> humility to admit the product's seemingly apparent faults - something
> that, unfortunately, seems endemic in business culture -- in both
> countries.
> ===
> 73, Frank
>
> ._._.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [PCR-1000] ??
>
>
> <snip>
> > ...AOR was demonstrating a black box receiver prototype that looked
> pretty
> > nice, but without any real testing we won't know if it's a good
> product or
> > another bomb. ,,,,,
> <end snip>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/05
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> PCR-1000 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pcr-1000
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:PCR-1000 at mailman.qth.net
>
>
More information about the PCR-1000
mailing list