[PCR-1000] PCR Command Codes

Michael A. Waldron [email protected]
Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:50:42 -0600


I was around when the PRC-1000 first came out, and all this was done.

Icom will not release the 'official' document to the public domain. It 
doesn't matter how many people you get to ask them, they just don't care.

Now, a quick web search will turn up all the information you need to 
implement PRC-1000 support. As I remember there are two different documents 
that both contain the same information, they were gathered by RS232 
analysis of the data stream several years ago after it became apparent that 
Icom was not going to budge on their policy of not releasing the 
'proprietary' information. The PCR-1000 (and 100) use a fairly trivial 
protocol.

-Mike

At 07:46 PM 3/21/2004, Dwayne Walker wrote:
>Hi Group
>A question came up recently about access to the communication method that 
>the PCR uses to communicate via the serial port. Specifically the point 
>that Icom has not released this information publicly like they have with 
>the C-IV protocol. This of course means to program for the PCR you must do 
>a guess and go method. This is time consuming and dose not inspire 
>confidence among programers. If this information where publicly available 
>there would be far more programers willing to write programs for the PCR 
>as well as incorporate the PCR as a supported receiver in there software. 
>Not to mention the general improvement of all Software designed to work 
>with the PCR.
>
>So how can we get Icom to release this information? well the only way to 
>do this is to Petition them as a group. If we can show that a significant 
>portion of their customers find the public release of the communication 
>method the PCR uses a valuable asset. This will show that there customer 
>base will be positively affected by such an act.
>
>One potential problem with this is that they may have a contract with Bono 
>(or what ever that new software is shipping with the PCR.) In addition to 
>this I do not know if any such petition has already been tried. In either 
>case it seams that it is worth a shot. I thought I would send this message 
>to get a feel for the support of this idea. Please give any and all 
>comments. And feel free to indicate if you don't support such a movement 
>and the reasoning behind it.
>
>thank you very much for your time
>
>Dwayne WB5PLJ
>
>
>
>
>
>("Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire it 
>is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." -- George Washington)
>
>______________________________________________________________
>PCR-1000 mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pcr-1000
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:[email protected]

---
Michael A. Waldron, AE0MW
PGP: http://www.mikew.org/mypgpkey.txt