[PCR-1000] Considering the PCR-1000

Kai Gunter Brandt [email protected]
Sat, 05 Apr 2003 22:14:48 +0200


At 12:49 05.04.2003 -0500, you wrote:
>One nice thing that WinRadio provides is a Visual basic interface/API (they
>call it "Radio Basic", and it's free) - making it easy to construct your own
>software to drive and/or control the radio.  They provide the 'building
>blocks' of the controls - even the tuner wheel... WinRadio has even run
>contests, asking folks to send in their best radio software ideas & code and
>has awarded radios as the prizes.

Yes and they also have an library to make plugins. xrs.winradio.com this is 
for the hardcore people who are using C, C++ and or Pascal ie Delphi

>and.. WinRadio also publishes the interface spec.  Something I wish Icom was
>ore forthcoming about - although a lot of people have reverse engineered the
>command set.

Yes this is one of the reasons i didn't buy PCR1000, i dont like the GUI 
and my radio needs are to make my own interfaces and functions. Reverse 
enginering is one way to solve the trouble but they should made this 
public. I think WinRadio has some advantage with this politic.

>WinRadio also has models that go well beyond 1.3gHZ.

Yes and even when they say that the radio is going from 150kHz-1.3GHz the 
radio is actualy going up to 1.6GHz but not 100% accurate on the frequency 
above 1.3GHz

And i love to get an winradio or ICOM for 0-2GHz. Maybe one of the companys 
can make a tranceiver :o)