From N5MNX at outlook.com  Sun Apr 10 10:54:09 2022
From: N5MNX at outlook.com (JJ Knight)
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 14:54:09 +0000
Subject: [PBARC] This is looking bad Brothers.
Message-ID: <SA1PR05MB8389EE955CC8AD6EE00ADBEDFCEB9@SA1PR05MB8389.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>

[cid:image002.png at 01D84CC0.E914DCC0]

JJ
N5MNX

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220410/cd3fd049/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D3AB1FE11071453CA491D8C10B5A0F68.png
Type: image/png
Size: 476690 bytes
Desc: D3AB1FE11071453CA491D8C10B5A0F68.png
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220410/cd3fd049/attachment-0001.png>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Sat Apr 16 11:51:01 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:51:01 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
Message-ID: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>

All -  

 

I'm sending out this "questionnaire" to get your thoughts on moving the
442.175 repeater.  

 

As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there are
issues with the site.  Many of them are environmental and just the ease of
being able to work on the equipment. 

 

While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site
depending on the feedback we receive.  Our biggest issue is getting internet
service.  Many companies won't allow us to use their company internet (for
obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.  Mifi devices
don't work well, if at all, in a metal building. 

 

I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful of
those that might have differing opinions.  

 

Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to
be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.

 

Tnx es 73,

Glenn

N5RN

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220416/61ddaede/attachment.html>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Sun Apr 17 15:25:29 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn Wolf)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 14:25:29 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
References: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
Message-ID: <18789DE9-8D54-4A78-B191-7D0F1E961B20@arwolfpack.com>

All -

There are a few issues involved with why we are lolling at moving the repeater(s).  I mentioned the environmental issues and the issue of just physically being able to work on the equipment.   Along the same lines our repeater custodian has voiced his concerns about just being physically able to go to the sight and do the work.  

The relocation of the 70 repeater to the Hardin site is a lot more ?friendly? when it comes to performing maintenance.  

W0MS has been helping with repeater work as of late.   Thanks Mike.   

Fortunately we have no expenses related to the mifi thanks to N5MNX and to his generosity.  

If we keep the 440 repeater at its current location we will definitely need someone to step up and work on the issues at the 440 site.   If you are interested please let us know.  

Personally, if the issues we have at Simmons can be resolved I?m fine with leaving it there.   We took a poll not long ago and the overwhelming opinion was to keep the DMR setup intact.   I will defer to Mike on addressing the pi-star issues.  He seems confident that they can and will be resolved.  

My tentative vote is to leave the 440 machine where it is and as it is contingent on finding someone willing to work that site and the DMR/pi-star issues getting resolved.  

Glenn

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 16, 2022, at 10:51, Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:
> 
> ?
> All - 
>  
> I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 442.175 repeater. 
>  
> As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there are issues with the site.  Many of them are environmental and just the ease of being able to work on the equipment.
>  
> While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site depending on the feedback we receive.  Our biggest issue is getting internet service.  Many companies won?t allow us to use their company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.  Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.
>  
> I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful of those that might have differing opinions. 
>  
> Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.
>  
> Tnx es 73,
> Glenn
> N5RN
> ______________________________________________________________
> PBARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/7f5ccfef/attachment.html>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Sun Apr 17 16:48:26 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn Wolf)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:48:26 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Fwd:  Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <BL3PR01MB69641B2559828761C55240F5BCF19@BL3PR01MB6964.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References: <BL3PR01MB69641B2559828761C55240F5BCF19@BL3PR01MB6964.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Message-ID: <ab72e10b-9c0b-aa6a-882b-1d569f2e5813@arwolfpack.com>

All -

It seems that many when they respond to the "questionnaire" are not 
replying to the reflector but to me.? I will forward the emails I've 
received so that.? PLEASE make sure that the PBARC reflector 
(pbarc at mailman.qth.net) is on your to line or your cc line.

This one is form Mike, WOMS.


Hi, All.

Thanks to Glenn for letting us all comment on the relocations of the 
repeaters at Simmons. I do not use Facebook for a host of reasons, but 
appreciate the opportunity to comment on the relocations.

Obviously, Simmons is a good antenna location because it is high ? 
probably 130+ feet which is likely the tallest non-tower location in the 
city. The environment is not ideal, but from my observation many of the 
serviceability and reliability issues can be remedied.

The proposed changes will likely result in changes to services presently 
available. The extent of the changes is apparently unknown, and my 
understanding is that no one has even tried to assess the impact. Would 
it not be more respectful of all Club members to know, in advance, what 
changes in service are likely from these changes?

I would hope that the Club would seek to expand their coverage and 
services over time. This posture will to make it possible to expand 
membership and at the same time, not purposefully, eliminate services to 
current members.

For these reasons, I am against the relocations.

Mike.

*From:* pbarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net <pbarc-bounces at mailman.qth.net> 
*On Behalf Of *Glenn
*Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2022 10:51 AM
*To:* PBARC Reflector <pbarc at mailman.qth.net>
*Subject:* [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater

All -

I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 
442.175 repeater.

As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there 
are issues with the site.? Many of them are environmental and just the 
ease of being able to work on the equipment.

While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site 
depending on the feedback we receive.? Our biggest issue is getting 
internet service.? Many companies won?t allow us to use their company 
internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi 
device. Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.

I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and 
respectful of those that might have differing opinions.

Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants 
to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.

Tnx es 73,

Glenn

N5RN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/4ae29e4f/attachment-0001.html>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Sun Apr 17 16:49:04 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn Wolf)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:49:04 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Fwd:  Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <445DA9D8-B9A9-46FE-B2F0-DB8AF830699D@hxcore.ol>
References: <445DA9D8-B9A9-46FE-B2F0-DB8AF830699D@hxcore.ol>
Message-ID: <acda37cb-67fd-2ab7-ff8a-1123d953ad3e@arwolfpack.com>

This one is from Dale



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	RE: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
Date: 	Sat, 16 Apr 2022 11:14:33 -0500
From: 	Robert Holland <n5rac1 at gmail.com>
To: 	Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com>



I am not opposed if a suitable site can be found. Seems to be a lot of 
lightning strikes at the Simmons site.

Dale

N5RAC

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

*From: *Glenn <mailto:glenn at arwolfpack.com>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 16, 2022 10:51 AM
*To: *PBARC Reflector <mailto:pbarc at mailman.qth.net>
*Subject: *[PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater

All -

I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 
442.175 repeater.

As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there 
are issues with the site.? Many of them are environmental and just the 
ease of being able to work on the equipment.

While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site 
depending on the feedback we receive.? Our biggest issue is getting 
internet service.? Many companies won?t allow us to use their company 
internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi 
device. Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.

I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and 
respectful of those that might have differing opinions.

Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants 
to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.

Tnx es 73,

Glenn

N5RN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/198e5771/attachment.html>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Sun Apr 17 16:50:06 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn Wolf)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:50:06 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Fwd:  Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <5374F7A1-3BE9-4E22-9666-23F8E4113CC3@yahoo.com>
References: <5374F7A1-3BE9-4E22-9666-23F8E4113CC3@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <5b1d64bc-930c-4782-9b10-61cd4c6282ff@arwolfpack.com>

 From Clint.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
Date: 	Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:47:45 -0500
From: 	clint yates <relaytech1960 at yahoo.com>
To: 	Glenn Wolf <glenn at arwolfpack.com>



Whoever works on it if we leave it there will need a Kevlar vest . I 
think the club should provide it?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 17, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Glenn Wolf <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:
>
> ? All -
>
> There are a few issues involved with why we are lolling at moving the 
> repeater(s). ?I mentioned the environmental issues and the issue of 
> just physically being able to work on the equipment. ? Along the same 
> lines our repeater custodian has voiced his concerns about just being 
> physically able to go to the sight and do the work.
>
> The relocation of the 70 repeater to the Hardin site is a lot more 
> ?friendly? when it comes to performing maintenance.
>
> W0MS has been helping with repeater work as of late. Thanks Mike.
>
> Fortunately we have no expenses related to the mifi thanks to N5MNX 
> and to his generosity.
>
> If we keep the 440 repeater at its current location we will definitely 
> need someone to step up and work on the issues at the 440 site. ? If 
> you are interested please let us know.
>
> Personally, if the issues we have at Simmons can be resolved I?m fine 
> with leaving it there. ? We took a poll not long ago and the 
> overwhelming opinion was to keep the DMR setup intact. ? I will defer 
> to Mike on addressing the pi-star issues. ?He seems confident that 
> they can and will be resolved.
>
> My tentative vote is to leave the 440 machine where it is and as it is 
> contingent on finding someone willing to work that site and the 
> DMR/pi-star issues getting resolved.
>
> Glenn
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 16, 2022, at 10:51, Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>>
>> All -
>>
>> I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving 
>> the 442.175 repeater.
>>
>> As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but 
>> there are issues with the site.? Many of them are environmental and 
>> just the ease of being able to work on the equipment.
>>
>> While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a 
>> site depending on the feedback we receive.? Our biggest issue is 
>> getting internet service.? Many companies won?t allow us to use their 
>> company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a 
>> mifi device.? Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal 
>> building.
>>
>> I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and 
>> respectful of those that might have differing opinions.
>>
>> Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and 
>> wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to 
>> this email.
>>
>> Tnx es 73,
>>
>> Glenn
>>
>> N5RN
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> PBARC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> PBARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/38b7a602/attachment-0001.html>

From kk5zd at aristotle.net  Sun Apr 17 18:24:54 2022
From: kk5zd at aristotle.net (KEITH)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:24:54 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
Message-ID: <mailman.177.1650234311.3596.pbarc@mailman.qth.net>

I'm in favor of moving the 442.175. The coverage of the? .700 repeater doesn't seem to be diminished that I can tell at present. If we can get the mifi to work at the water tower, I think the move will not keep those wanting to use it from doing so.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com> Date: 4/16/22  10:51 AM  (GMT-06:00) To: PBARC Reflector <pbarc at mailman.qth.net> Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater All -? ?I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 442.175 repeater.? ?As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there are issues with the site.? Many of them are environmental and just the ease of being able to work on the equipment. ?While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site depending on the feedback we receive.? Our biggest issue is getting internet service.? Many companies won?t allow us to use their company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.? Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building. ?I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful of those that might have differing opinions.? ?Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.?Tnx es 73,GlennN5RN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/12a4634b/attachment.html>

From leelinzy at gmail.com  Sun Apr 17 19:16:34 2022
From: leelinzy at gmail.com (Steven Linzy)
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 18:16:34 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <18789DE9-8D54-4A78-B191-7D0F1E961B20@arwolfpack.com>
References: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
	<18789DE9-8D54-4A78-B191-7D0F1E961B20@arwolfpack.com>
Message-ID: <CAF1FGM_rugYV-JPHmZUrObJ8t87UEP4tkV6=8GK9frdHYjbZUw@mail.gmail.com>

I'm at favor but buy a cell phone booster with an Omni antenna  to help the
mifi


On Sun, Apr 17, 2022, 2:25 PM Glenn Wolf <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:

> All -
>
> There are a few issues involved with why we are lolling at moving the
> repeater(s).  I mentioned the environmental issues and the issue of just
> physically being able to work on the equipment.   Along the same lines our
> repeater custodian has voiced his concerns about just being physically able
> to go to the sight and do the work.
>
> The relocation of the 70 repeater to the Hardin site is a lot more
> ?friendly? when it comes to performing maintenance.
>
> W0MS has been helping with repeater work as of late.   Thanks Mike.
>
> Fortunately we have no expenses related to the mifi thanks to N5MNX and to
> his generosity.
>
> If we keep the 440 repeater at its current location we will definitely
> need someone to step up and work on the issues at the 440 site.   If you
> are interested please let us know.
>
> Personally, if the issues we have at Simmons can be resolved I?m fine with
> leaving it there.   We took a poll not long ago and the overwhelming
> opinion was to keep the DMR setup intact.   I will defer to Mike on
> addressing the pi-star issues.  He seems confident that they can and will
> be resolved.
>
> My tentative vote is to leave the 440 machine where it is and as it is
> contingent on finding someone willing to work that site and the DMR/pi-star
> issues getting resolved.
>
> Glenn
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 16, 2022, at 10:51, Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:
>
> ?
>
> All -
>
>
>
> I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the
> 442.175 repeater.
>
>
>
> As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there
> are issues with the site.  Many of them are environmental and just the ease
> of being able to work on the equipment.
>
>
>
> While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site
> depending on the feedback we receive.  Our biggest issue is getting
> internet service.  Many companies won?t allow us to use their company
> internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.
> Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.
>
>
>
> I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful
> of those that might have differing opinions.
>
>
>
> Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to
> be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.
>
>
>
> Tnx es 73,
>
> Glenn
>
> N5RN
> ______________________________________________________________
> PBARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> PBARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220417/34740c4e/attachment.html>

From drg at michaelgunter.com  Mon Apr 18 14:33:18 2022
From: drg at michaelgunter.com (Michael Gunter)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:33:18 +0000
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <20220417222511.261C1149A9FB@mail.qsl.net>
References: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
	<20220417222511.261C1149A9FB@mail.qsl.net>
Message-ID: <8CEB87CA-F4CF-49F0-B850-D8701D031F0F@michaelgunter.com>

OK.

I?m not familiar on how decisions for the Club are made. Someone please post the decision when it is made.

Thanks,

Mike.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2022, at 5:25 PM, KEITH <kk5zd at aristotle.net> wrote:

?
I'm in favor of moving the 442.175. The coverage of the  .700 repeater doesn't seem to be diminished that I can tell at present. If we can get the mifi to work at the water tower, I think the move will not keep those wanting to use it from doing so.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com>
Date: 4/16/22 10:51 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: PBARC Reflector <pbarc at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater

All -

I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 442.175 repeater.

As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there are issues with the site.  Many of them are environmental and just the ease of being able to work on the equipment.

While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site depending on the feedback we receive.  Our biggest issue is getting internet service.  Many companies won?t allow us to use their company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.  Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.

I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful of those that might have differing opinions.

Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.

Tnx es 73,
Glenn
N5RN
______________________________________________________________
PBARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220418/145bc9cb/attachment-0001.html>

From glenn at arwolfpack.com  Mon Apr 18 15:21:27 2022
From: glenn at arwolfpack.com (Glenn Wolf)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:21:27 -0500
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <8CEB87CA-F4CF-49F0-B850-D8701D031F0F@michaelgunter.com>
References: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
	<20220417222511.261C1149A9FB@mail.qsl.net>
	<8CEB87CA-F4CF-49F0-B850-D8701D031F0F@michaelgunter.com>
Message-ID: <5511ebb7-0304-8e89-fd30-afcbaf7f1e55@arwolfpack.com>

Mike -

Usually there is an obvious consensus and that is how we move forward.? 
In this case it might not be as clear.? In that case we may have to 
resort to other means to decide what to do.? Others can voice their 
opinions but it is current members that decide what is done.


de n5rn

On 04/18/2022 13:33:18, Michael Gunter wrote:
> OK.
>
> I?m not familiar on how decisions for the Club are made. Someone 
> please post the decision when it is made.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Apr 17, 2022, at 5:25 PM, KEITH <kk5zd at aristotle.net> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>> I'm in favor of moving the 442.175. The coverage of the? .700 
>> repeater doesn't seem to be diminished that I can tell at present. If 
>> we can get the mifi to work at the water tower, I think the move will 
>> not keep those wanting to use it from doing so.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com>
>> Date: 4/16/22 10:51 AM (GMT-06:00)
>> To: PBARC Reflector <pbarc at mailman.qth.net>
>> Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
>>
>> All -
>>
>> I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving 
>> the 442.175 repeater.
>>
>> As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but 
>> there are issues with the site.? Many of them are environmental and 
>> just the ease of being able to work on the equipment.
>>
>> While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a 
>> site depending on the feedback we receive.? Our biggest issue is 
>> getting internet service.? Many companies won?t allow us to use their 
>> company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a 
>> mifi device.? Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal 
>> building.
>>
>> I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and 
>> respectful of those that might have differing opinions.
>>
>> Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and 
>> wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to 
>> this email.
>>
>> Tnx es 73,
>>
>> Glenn
>>
>> N5RN
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> PBARC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220418/76e83b13/attachment.html>

From drg at michaelgunter.com  Mon Apr 18 15:25:02 2022
From: drg at michaelgunter.com (Michael Gunter)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 19:25:02 +0000
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater
In-Reply-To: <5511ebb7-0304-8e89-fd30-afcbaf7f1e55@arwolfpack.com>
References: <37d101d851a9$c640fba0$52c2f2e0$@arwolfpack.com>
	<20220417222511.261C1149A9FB@mail.qsl.net>
	<8CEB87CA-F4CF-49F0-B850-D8701D031F0F@michaelgunter.com>
	<5511ebb7-0304-8e89-fd30-afcbaf7f1e55@arwolfpack.com>
Message-ID: <D881C2B3-272F-4B28-AA3C-4C5CD909AB37@michaelgunter.com>

OK. Just let me know what is decided.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 18, 2022, at 2:21 PM, Glenn Wolf <glenn at arwolfpack.com> wrote:

?

Mike -

Usually there is an obvious consensus and that is how we move forward.  In this case it might not be as clear.  In that case we may have to resort to other means to decide what to do.  Others can voice their opinions but it is current members that decide what is done.


de n5rn

On 04/18/2022 13:33:18, Michael Gunter wrote:
OK.

I?m not familiar on how decisions for the Club are made. Someone please post the decision when it is made.

Thanks,

Mike.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17, 2022, at 5:25 PM, KEITH <kk5zd at aristotle.net><mailto:kk5zd at aristotle.net> wrote:

?
I'm in favor of moving the 442.175. The coverage of the  .700 repeater doesn't seem to be diminished that I can tell at present. If we can get the mifi to work at the water tower, I think the move will not keep those wanting to use it from doing so.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Glenn <glenn at arwolfpack.com><mailto:glenn at arwolfpack.com>
Date: 4/16/22 10:51 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: PBARC Reflector <pbarc at mailman.qth.net><mailto:pbarc at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [PBARC] Moving of the 442.175 DMR repeater

All -

I?m sending out this ?questionnaire? to get your thoughts on moving the 442.175 repeater.

As you may know, the Simmons Bank location has served us well but there are issues with the site.  Many of them are environmental and just the ease of being able to work on the equipment.

While no site has been identified we are considering looking for a site depending on the feedback we receive.  Our biggest issue is getting internet service.  Many companies won?t allow us to use their company internet (for obvious reasons) so that leaves us with using a mifi device.  Mifi devices don?t work well, if at all, in a metal building.

I encourage you to share your thoughts but please be civil and respectful of those that might have differing opinions.

Finally, if you know of someone who is not on this reflector and wants to be, please let me know by direct email not by replying to this email.

Tnx es 73,
Glenn
N5RN
______________________________________________________________
PBARC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/pbarc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:PBARC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/pbarc/attachments/20220418/63c880bb/attachment-0001.html>