[PBARC] HF test results part 1
WOLF, EARNEST G
[email protected]
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:14:48 -0500
Central United States Earthquake Consortium
2003
HF Radio Communication test
Summary
Date & Time :
August 18th , 2003 ( Monday ) from 1900 to 2020 UTC
Goal:
The goal of the test was to evaluate the CUSEC HF radio capabilities
using FEMA FNARS radio systems and Amateur Radio (HAM) Equipment
from the Seven member state EOC locations..
Procedure:
A. Each CUSEC state was contacted in advance with the Test Dates,
Times and Frequencies.
B. The test was conducted on the 20-meter frequency for the first 20
minutes and then changed to the 40-meter frequency for the
remaining time. This was done for the purpose of evaluating these
two (2) frequencies for best overall propagation and communication
conditions.
C. Indiana was the Net Control Station (NCS) for this test.
D. To test the communications capability; a survey of seven (7)
questions was assembled .Each CUSEC participating EOC was asked for
this survey information during the test via HF radio.
E. As a last resort , all members were given a Phone number to
contact in case of difficulty during the test... Three (3) of the
members did call to clear up frequency assignments and all three
were able to check in during the test.
Results: (form the NCS Indiana station)
A. FNARS equipment performed OK from Indiana & Illinois, with
Tennessee checking in via Illinois relay.
B. All CUSEC member states EOC locations were contacted during the
test via HAM radio except Tennessee. Tennessee made contact via the
FNARS frequency only .
C. Five of seven-CUSEC states agreed that a Bi-monthly CUSEC HF
radio net would be a good idea.
D. All participating states communicated from their state EOC either
directly or via relay.
E. We have a good member contact list for CUSEC communication
officers, thanks to Kerri Hall & Jim Wilkinson
F. Six of Seven members communicated answers to the seven (7)
survey questions. Tennessee did not.
G. Approximately 20 Ham stations were involved during the 1.5-hour
test.
Also see excel data sheet (CUSEC HF Test Aug 2003 Info ) for
detailed info...
Conclusion:
A. Very successful test with best results on the 40 meter
frequencies using Ham radio.
B. HF radio should be included in the CUSEC communications plan.
C. Ham radio was a very useful communications tool.
D. Off Site Hams were very successful in relaying survey question
and answers
E. Indiana SEMA Ham EOC station needed more transmit power;
reception was good.
Recommendations:
A.. HF radio should be included in the CUSEC communications plan.
B. Ham radio frequencies should be included in the Cusec
Communications plan.
C. Rotate NCS duties through all member states to better evaluate
overall communication performance of a back up HF radio network.
D. Use 40 meter frequencies only for the next test. (7.805 Mhz
FNARS & 7.297 Mhz HAM )
E. All member States need to review their HF radio equipment
conditions and Transmit power.
F. Need for more operator personnel especially offsite for relays.
G. Member states should set up intra practice sessions to fine tune
equipment .
H. Use UTC time only for future Tests or Operations and let each
state make the local time adjustments.
Reference :
HF ... High Frequency 3 - 30 Mega Hertz range
FNARS...Federal National Radio System or Harris radio equipment
20 meters... 14.3965 & 14.313 Mhz
40 meters... 7.805 & 7.298 Mhz
EOC... Emergency Operation Center
NCS.... Net Control Station
UTC... Universal Time Coordinated
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/jFYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/