From goody.k3ng at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 13:58:52 2018 From: goody.k3ng at gmail.com (Goody K3NG) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 12:58:52 -0600 Subject: [PaQSO] Log Check Reports Message-ID: A message from our scoring team: All of the PA QSO party log check reports were emailed last night. The report was sent to the email address in the Cabrillo file or the log submission return address. If you haven?t received yours, check your spam folder. The overall final rescore summary can be found at the very end of the file. This Entry category and final score that will be used to determine the final results and awards. If gross errors were found in the QSO line(s) they are listed at the top of the file along with a *numbered* tag at the end of the line that explains the cause. Most logs did not have any gross errors because logging software informs the user of the error and asks for a correction prior to logging. These QSO?s are assigned zero points. This is followed a detailed listing of each QSO with the final assigned points and a tag which indicates if the exchange matches the other log, the exchange was determined to be correct, or there was an error. The rest of the file contains summary supporting information sections to show which callsigns were normalized for analysis, the bonus station QSO?s, the county line QSO?s, and a listing of QSO?s assigned zero points along with the cause (tag & data from the other log). Some entries missed logging the county line stations in all counties. There was no penalty for missing these QSO?s and no credit given for these missed QSO?s. There are also no penalties for duplicate QSO?s found in the log. The participants can use this report to determine how to reduce mistakes and improve their scores in future QSO parties. From n8xx at arrl.org Thu Dec 6 16:20:44 2018 From: n8xx at arrl.org (Hank Greeb) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:20:44 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] Log Check Reports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry, but I'm so cornfuzed by the LCR which some robot sent me that it makes no sense.? I'll try to check what I sent vs what your robot accepted, but since my entry is cerrainly NOT in contention for a certifcate or plaque, it mattereth knot anyway. 72/73 de n8xx hg QRP >99.44% of the time On 12/6/2018 1:58 PM, Goody K3NG wrote: > A message from our scoring team: > > All of the PA QSO party log check reports were emailed last night. The > report was sent to the email address in the Cabrillo file or the log > submission return address. If you haven?t received yours, check your spam > folder. > > > > The overall final rescore summary can be found at the very end of the file. > This Entry category and final score that will be used to determine the > final results and awards. > > > > If gross errors were found in the QSO line(s) they are listed at the top of > the file along with a *numbered* tag at the end of the line that explains > the cause. Most logs did not have any gross errors because logging software > informs the user of the error and asks for a correction prior to logging. > These QSO?s are assigned zero points. > > > > This is followed a detailed listing of each QSO with the final assigned > points and a tag which indicates if the exchange matches the other log, the > exchange was determined to be correct, or there was an error. > > > > The rest of the file contains summary supporting information sections to > show which callsigns were normalized for analysis, the bonus station QSO?s, > the county line QSO?s, and a listing of QSO?s assigned zero points along > with the cause (tag & data from the other log). > > > > Some entries missed logging the county line stations in all counties. There > was no penalty for missing these QSO?s and no credit given for these missed > QSO?s. There are also no penalties for duplicate QSO?s found in the log. > > > > The participants can use this report to determine how to reduce mistakes > and improve their scores in future QSO parties. > ______________________________________________________________ > PaQSO mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to n8xx at arrl.org From tvguy07 at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 18:04:01 2018 From: tvguy07 at gmail.com (John Myers) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:04:01 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] Log Check Reports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5B64F549-E0FD-4C8E-B716-882F1C9866FB@gmail.com> I?m happy to receive the LCR. All too often, I forget to download one from the contests that I entered. Anybody that knows me knows that I am kind of a numbers nerd. I did have a question about mine, and emailed the address provided. They responded promptly with an answer to my query. Thanks guys, 73, John Myers , KD8MQ > On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Hank Greeb wrote: > > Sorry, but I'm so cornfuzed by the LCR which some robot sent me that it makes no sense. I'll try to check what I sent vs what your robot accepted, but since my entry is cerrainly NOT in contention for a certifcate or plaque, it mattereth knot anyway. > > 72/73 de n8xx hg > QRP >99.44% of the time > >> On 12/6/2018 1:58 PM, Goody K3NG wrote: >> A message from our scoring team: >> >> All of the PA QSO party log check reports were emailed last night. The >> report was sent to the email address in the Cabrillo file or the log >> submission return address. If you haven?t received yours, check your spam >> folder. >> >> >> >> The overall final rescore summary can be found at the very end of the file. >> This Entry category and final score that will be used to determine the >> final results and awards. >> >> >> >> If gross errors were found in the QSO line(s) they are listed at the top of >> the file along with a *numbered* tag at the end of the line that explains >> the cause. Most logs did not have any gross errors because logging software >> informs the user of the error and asks for a correction prior to logging. >> These QSO?s are assigned zero points. >> >> >> >> This is followed a detailed listing of each QSO with the final assigned >> points and a tag which indicates if the exchange matches the other log, the >> exchange was determined to be correct, or there was an error. >> >> >> >> The rest of the file contains summary supporting information sections to >> show which callsigns were normalized for analysis, the bonus station QSO?s, >> the county line QSO?s, and a listing of QSO?s assigned zero points along >> with the cause (tag & data from the other log). >> >> >> >> Some entries missed logging the county line stations in all counties. There >> was no penalty for missing these QSO?s and no credit given for these missed >> QSO?s. There are also no penalties for duplicate QSO?s found in the log. >> >> >> >> The participants can use this report to determine how to reduce mistakes >> and improve their scores in future QSO parties. >> ______________________________________________________________ >> PaQSO mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to n8xx at arrl.org > ______________________________________________________________ > PaQSO mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to tvguy07 at gmail.com From goody.k3ng at gmail.com Fri Dec 28 17:49:30 2018 From: goody.k3ng at gmail.com (Goody K3NG) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 17:49:30 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] 2018 PA QSO Party Results Message-ID: Results have been posted on the website: https://paqso.org/party-results.html From dave at pkministrywebs.com Sat Dec 29 00:40:21 2018 From: dave at pkministrywebs.com (Dave Edmonds) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 00:40:21 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] 2018 PA QSO Party Results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi PAQP... Thanks for posting the PAQP results. As I was reviewing the out of state scores, I was interested to know how I did compared to other out of state stations in my category. I barely missed the top five list. It might be helpful to us out of state stations to also have a list of OOS stations ranked by the entry category. The Out Of State stations are competing against other OOS stations for the 3 plaque categories. I bet the PA Stations probably would like to see how they did in the state rankings too. While looking at the rules and award list, I thought that it was a bit odd that the that the entry categories were not the same as the plaque categories for the OOS stations. There was a category for Single Op Lp CW, but all of the US stations competed for 3 mixed mode awards. Perhaps have separate sections in the rules for PA stations and one for OOS stations. One more thing that was a bit confusing... The awards list stated that plaques would be awarded to the top USA out of state, Canadian AND DX score in each category. This reads like there would be three winners for each category (SOHP, SOLP, SOQRP, MO, DX and Canada). I share these thoughts as an OOS station, a regular PAQP player, and a QSO Party Chairman. I look forward to playing in the 2019 PAQP. I would also like to invite everyone to turn their antennas to the South for the Carolina Weekend (SCQP & NCQP) coming February 23-24, 2019. 73s Dave WN4AFP On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:50 PM Goody K3NG wrote: > Results have been posted on the website: > https://paqso.org/party-results.html > ______________________________________________________________ > PaQSO mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to dave at pkministrywebs.com > -- Dave Edmonds Dave at PKMinistryWebs.com From jimk8mr at aol.com Sun Dec 30 18:01:43 2018 From: jimk8mr at aol.com (Jim) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 18:01:43 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] 2018 PA QSO Party Results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <92343EBA-2912-4F1F-8DA7-84443987EE3A@aol.com> I agree that additional lists are in order. Unlike printed results, online results cost no more to add lots of additional information. A few other items I?d love to see, which ought to be pretty easy to generate since it appears that the logs were thoroughly processed: 1. A breakdown of total reported QSOs by band and mode. 2. A breakdown of reported QSOs, by mode, for each county and ARRL section. In particular how many times Forest county stations shows up in various logs, rather than QSOs reported by a station(s) in Forest county. (So that you?d see how many QSOs were made with VY1 even if a VY1 does not send in a log.) 3. A breakdown of total QSOs by hour. We do provide this information in the Ohio QSO Party's report. 73 - Jim K8MR > On Dec 29, 2018, at 12:40 AM, Dave Edmonds wrote: > > Hi PAQP... > > Thanks for posting the PAQP results. > > As I was reviewing the out of state scores, I was interested to know how I > did compared to other out of state stations in my category. I barely missed > the top five list. > > It might be helpful to us out of state stations to also have a list of OOS > stations ranked by the entry category. > > The Out Of State stations are competing against other OOS stations for the > 3 plaque categories. I bet the PA Stations probably would like to see how > they did in the state rankings too. > > While looking at the rules and award list, I thought that it was a bit odd > that the that the entry categories were not the same as the plaque > categories for the OOS stations. There was a category for Single Op Lp CW, > but all of the US > stations competed for 3 mixed mode awards. > > Perhaps have separate sections in the rules for PA stations and one for OOS > stations. > > One more thing that was a bit confusing... The awards list stated that > plaques would be awarded to the top USA out of state, Canadian AND DX score > in each category. This reads like there would be three winners for each > category (SOHP, SOLP, SOQRP, MO, DX and Canada). > > I share these thoughts as an OOS station, a regular PAQP player, and a QSO > Party Chairman. > > I look forward to playing in the 2019 PAQP. > > I would also like to invite everyone to turn their antennas to the South > for the Carolina Weekend (SCQP & NCQP) coming February 23-24, 2019. > > 73s Dave WN4AFP > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:50 PM Goody K3NG wrote: > >> Results have been posted on the website: >> https://paqso.org/party-results.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> PaQSO mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to dave at pkministrywebs.com >> > -- > Dave Edmonds > Dave at PKMinistryWebs.com > ______________________________________________________________ > PaQSO mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to jimk8mr at aol.com From goody.k3ng at gmail.com Sun Dec 30 22:03:40 2018 From: goody.k3ng at gmail.com (Goody K3NG) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 22:03:40 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] Club Results Have Been Updated Message-ID: https://paqso.org/party-results.html 73 Goody K3NG From davidastout at yahoo.com Mon Dec 31 05:56:59 2018 From: davidastout at yahoo.com (David Stout) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 10:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PaQSO] Multi References: <123283433.4329459.1546253819539.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <123283433.4329459.1546253819539@mail.yahoo.com> I get the reasoning for nearly all of the changes but lumping Multi-Multi in with Multi-Single I will never understand. Dave KY3W From ak3vak3v at gmail.com Mon Dec 31 07:45:43 2018 From: ak3vak3v at gmail.com (Bob Price) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:45:43 -0500 Subject: [PaQSO] Multi In-Reply-To: <123283433.4329459.1546253819539@mail.yahoo.com> References: <123283433.4329459.1546253819539.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <123283433.4329459.1546253819539@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Agreed. On Mon, Dec 31, 2018, 5:58 AM David Stout via PaQSO I get the reasoning for nearly all of the changes but lumping Multi-Multi > in with Multi-Single I will never understand. > > Dave KY3W > ______________________________________________________________ > PaQSO mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to ak3vak3v at gmail.com > From aa4gt at comcast.net Sun Dec 30 12:04:44 2018 From: aa4gt at comcast.net (GEORGE TOMLINSON) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 17:04:44 -0000 Subject: [PaQSO] Fwd: NV4Z ARC In-Reply-To: <264636224.171163.1546186573385@connect.xfinity.com> References: <264636224.171163.1546186573385@connect.xfinity.com> Message-ID: <2019183716.171251.1546187484703@connect.xfinity.com> -------- Original Message ---------- From: GEORGE TOMLINSON To: Date: December 30, 2018 at 11:16 AM Subject: NV4Z ARC I started a NV4Z ARC in honor of all the work that Mary did to help people all over the World. I was proud of Mary and will never forget her friendship and never forget her smile. She was a special Lady. 73 George AA4GT proud of