[PaQSO] Puzzling

[Hank Greeb]

Shucky durn.  I for one really liked the PAQP.  I wish I had more time 
to devote to it last weekend.  Be of good cheer.  It's the nay sayers 
who usually write.

I'm sure we in Michigan would LOVE to have enough coverage to offer 
plaques for a "clean sweep."  A clean sweep hasn't been done in Michigan 
(according to the 2015 results) ever....

72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time

On 10/14/2015 10:20 PM, Michael Coslo wrote:
> I’m also baffled.
>
> If I might note, it gets a little discouraging to come home, and most of what I hear is all the things I’m doing wrong. Both via the list and privately.
>
> I always suggest that people who love contesting should try administering one. This is my tenth administration of the QSO Party. I am amazed.
>
> As you note -  the party is not broken. It does not need fixed. The original complaint that started this was an out of state Op who didn’t hear many mobiles. As noted, propagation was not terribly good. We have mobiles, we have activity.
>
> I am going to take a few days off from the list now, to quiet my ragged nerves. Carry on.
>
> Mike
>
>
>> On Oct 14, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Herb Krumich via PaQSO<paqso at mailman.qth.net>  wrote:
>>
>> I am baffled why hams try fixing things that aren't broke. This is a beautiful contest and the results every year confirm this.  So what if stations misses a few counties