[PaQSO] warning on PDF calculations and confirm rule for county line QSOs?

[C. Michael D'Alto]

I don't think it's a dumb question at all. . . I wondered that myself.  
I always counted it as three multipliers (the first contact), and one 
QSO.  Most of the logging programs I used over the years counted it the 
same way.  Last year I did run into scoring discrepancies last year when 
using N1MM for the first time, which I never got to the root of, so I 
simply calculated the score manually.  I haven't had the time go over my 
log yet, this year, so I can't comment if the score was calculated 
accurately or not.

73/DX,
Mike, K2CD op. K3MX, Pike Cty.

"My logger N1MM computed a higher total score than me. One reason is 
that I had forgotten that the 2 Penn. sections can be counted along with 
non-PA sections (this is pretty unusual). The only other discrepancy I 
can think of is for county line operations. For example, I thought that 
when you contact a 3-county station, that you counted 3 counties BUT 
ONLY ONE QSO. However, when I went back to read the rules, it's not 
clear ... the rules say that the county-line station gives out a single 
serial number, but that's not the same as explicitly saying that there 
is only one QSO point. So, do I count a 3-county county-line station as 
3 QSOs or 1 QSO? Hope this isn't a dumb question. -- Pete K0BAK 
______________________________________________________________ "


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus