[PaQSO] CQ Log Checking Team/scoring team

[Mark Kempisty]

Another thought is to use the note feature, Ctrl-N to add a note to the current or LAST QSO. I would enter the extra counties and serial number  and then use that info to edit the Cabrillo. N1MM can give you a list of notes entered for all QSO's the serial number would speed up finding the entry in the Cabrillo file. You would need to potentially manually recalculate the multipliers though.

Firing up a computer with N1MM on it to check closer...

Take care,
Mark

Mark Kempisty <mkempisty at verizon.net> wrote:

>A couple of hams pointed out that N1MM's quick edit feature will not let you change the number field. I was not able to test this  before my earlier message but I feared that would be the case.
>
>I am going to investigate this a little more.
>
>Take care,
>Mark
>AA3K
>
>"M. Kempisty" <mkempisty at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>Another thing you can do in N1MM after entering the second county line contact is use Ctrl-Q to go to quick edit mode for the LAST entered QSO. The fields will have a light blue background to let you know you are editing. Enter will save the update.
>>
>>Take Care,
>>Mark
>>AA3K
>>
>>
>>
>>Michael Coslo <mjc5 at psu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>Try that technique I just posted explained with N1MM. You'll end up with two QSOs with one sent exchange and two separate counties in the Cabrillo logs. 
>>
>>- 73 de Mike N3LI -
>>
>>On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Rob Nygren wrote:
>>
>>> Hank,
>>>    I share your confusion. I tried for two hours last night to get N1MM to 
>>> accept a blank number or the same number in order to log a county line. Now 
>>> I'm a newbie at N1MM, but I had no luck.
>>>    With my old logger, (a highly personalized version of TRLog), I would go 
>>> in after the contest and edit in FRA/FUL. But looking at the template for 
>>> the New England QSO party, (as an example), 
>>> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/neqp.txt , that exchange is too long by 
>>> one character. If the sponsors are using a program to cross-check the logs, 
>>> the too long exchange could be considered invalid.
>>>    When you look at the Cabrillo log output, all the logging programs 
>>> should handle the county line stations the same way. But this close to the 
>>> weekend, I don't think I want to confuse myself any further.  Guess we'll 
>>> just to take our chances??
>>
>>______________________________________________________________
>>PaQSO mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>______________________________________________________________
>>PaQSO mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>______________________________________________________________
>PaQSO mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html