[PaQSO] Sweep on CW?
Michael Coslo
mjc5 at psu.edu
Tue Oct 11 12:01:29 EDT 2011
On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Eric Tichansky wrote:
> The actual
> percentage may even be as high as half, there are many callsigns I never
> work in national contests outside of PAQP.
That figure is pretty darn close, from looking at the logs.
> Those type of operators need a different environment to develop
> running skills, not being subjected to the horrors of a massive pileup
> because of being in a rare county. I've heard operators completely
> shutdown and disappear when pileups get deep and they are no longer the
> one in control. Something like Field Day, NAQP or operating from a
> non-rare county would be a better place to learn for green ops,
> otherwise, having a "learning" experience like an unruly pileup would
> send any green operator off with a sour experience and likely have
> reservations about ever doing it again.
We need to Elmer these noobs. When there is a pileup - start dissecting it.
Also, I don't know if anyone else has tried this or not, but some times in a pileup, when there is a person who is calling when they shouldn't be, I have repeated their callsign back to them, and announced that I will *not* work them unless they play properly. That often gets a person to behave. Nothing like having a rare county not work you to enforce good behavior. 8^)
What we all need to remember is that the Mobile is competing in the party too. I want to get counties as well as hand them out. If I have dozens and dozens of Luzerne county QSOs while running, I'm going to not have many mults. note: LUZ is pretty much the biggest county activated. So yeah, I search and pounce as well as run frequencies. Like I say, we're competing too, not just operating to hand out rare counties to other Ops.
- 73 de Mike N3LI -
More information about the PaQSO
mailing list