[PaQSO] Which digital mode

[Bill Sheehan]

I did a whopping 5 of the PSK-31 Q's last year, but I'll admit,
they were HARD !!! VERY HARD !!!
 
I plan to stick with RTTY this year.
IF things get REAL desperate, I may try some PSK.
 
Too many PSK people just HAVE to send their 3-4 minute BRAG/B-S FILES.
 
As I said on another reflector,
 
I couldn't care less that  they have a whiz-bang,
super-charged, ROCKET powered computer with a 200 million
giga-hertz processor crafted by either NASA
or Bill Gates himself. 
An old wood fired, steam powered computer
encodes/decodes PSK just as well as the rocket powered ones.
 
When I'm doing a contest, I don't want to listen to that crappola.


 
> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:09:18 -0400
> From: bob.raker at gmail.com
> To: n3nbt at comcast.net
> CC: paqso at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [PaQSO] Which digital mode
> 
> Based on a casual review of 2009 results, there were 178 PSK and 41 PSK
> contacts reported for in-state stations.
> 
> I plan to try both.
> 
> 73,
> Bob
> W0BR/CUM
> 
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Bob Gundlach <n3nbt at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > Considering adding a little digital to our operations in Sullivan county
> > this year.
> >
> > Which would the more productive mode to use, RTTY or PSK?
> >
> >
> >
> > Bob & Jack
> >
> > N3NBT & N3BQB
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > PaQSO mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html