[PaQSO] 2008 Logging Software for Multi's

Al Zelna mr.mri at epix.net
Mon Sep 8 17:44:17 EDT 2008


Ron,

   It's my opinion you should choose WriteLog.  A pleasant and  
individually customizable front-end and flawless TCP/IP networking.   
We also proved it works with a combination of XP and Vista computers.

   It never missed a beat with our N3XLS effort last year, logging  
over 1700 Q's and 10min rates in excess of 160 Q/hr.  It also handled  
a (networked) 4A effort for K3CSG during FD with over 2000 Q's and  
10min rates over 250 Q/hr.

   Al Zelna, N3KAE


Quoting Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw at verizon.net>:

> I'd originally planned to continue to use the last version of the 

> KA3JWE software for this year's contest, same as I did last year.
>
> But there's a real possibility that we might go Multi-Multi
instead 
> of just Multi-Single this year.  (Having two fully operational
HF 
> stations is a big help with that!)
>
> I may elect to keep things relatively simple -- ie, use one
station 
> (the Corsair II) solely CW, the other (TS-480SAT) solely SSB (and 

> packet if I have that operational in time), keeping separate logs
on 
> each and merging them post-contest.  And if I don't find a
better 
> solution, that's probably what I'll end up doing.
>
> But I'm curious as to what other software packages other   
> Multi-transmitter stations are using, specifically:
> -- WB3W looks interesting but I know nothing of it beyond a good
reputation.
> -- N1MM looks interesting, but I'm not entirely comfortable,
based 
> on reading the PDF file, as to how well it will work.
> -- N3FJP is a package I'm familiar with, since WASH owns a copy   
> primarily for Field Day use.  But again, I'm not familiar with
how 
> it currently handles Pa QSO, and reading the online information   
> makes me wary of buying it just for this purpose, and only then
find 
> out that it won't quite do what I want.
>
> I don't mind spending or contributing a few shekels towards a   
> package, so I'm not limiting myself to freeware or shareware. 
But, 
> if I have to acquire something, I want a software app that will
work 
> with two independant stations, and will be relatively easy to use
-- 
> and I need enough time to become familiar with it, since I'll
have 
> to show some of the operators how to use it "on the fly."
>
> Any suggestions or thoughts welcome!
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> _______________________________________________
> PaQSO mailing list
> PaQSO at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso
>





More information about the PaQSO mailing list