[PaQSO] Request

[k2cddx at yahoo.com]

Hear, hear!  My exact sentiments and I could not have
said it any better.  I'm not anti-QRP, anti-Med PWR,
or anti-QRO.  However, I do believe everyone should
comete in their own class.  God Bless everyone.

vy 73,
Mike, K2CD

--- emiske at comcast.net wrote:

> Mike, 
> 
> If you're listening, I'm talking........
> 
> DEATH TO THE QRP MULTIPLIER!!!!!!!
> 
> What's the purpose? To equalize QRP scores to QRO
> scores? If so, why not give a mult of 1.3 or
> something like that to the medium power stations to
> equalize their scores to QRO scores? 
> 
> But why "equalize" any scores? Are not QRP stations
> in competition with QRP stations? QRO's vs QRO's?
> Medium vs. medium?
> 
> I understand that when it comes to the Portable,
> Rover, CW only, (others?) they are not divided into
> QRP, Medium and QRO. But there are just not enough
> entries in these categories/divisions to justify
> that.
> 
> If it is used at all, it should only be AFTER
> individual scores have been calculated so as to help
> out club scores where the club might have
> one/several/many members operating QRP. But for
> individual scores, it is not necessary. QRP should
> compete against QRP, medium power vs medium power
> and QRO vs QRO. 
> 
> Ed/WA3SES
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: Michael Coslo <mjc5 at psu.edu> 
> 
> > 
> > On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:19 PM, Goody K3NG wrote: 
> > 
> > > Greetings 
> > > 
> > > I figure this would be a good time to make a
> suggestion or request 
> > > as we have almost a year to chew on it, but
> could we create a Multi- 
> > > multi QRP category? This would be separate from
> the existing multi- 
> > > multi scores and not compete with them, shatter
> old records, 
> > > drastically change the personality of the Party,
> or hurt cute furry 
> > > kittens. :-) 
> > 
> > I'm not opposed to such a thing. It seems pretty
> interesting. Let's 
> > get some activity on the subject, and see what
> transpires... 
> > 
> > My thoughts are how many people are likely to
> participate in this 
> > manner? (note that low numbers are not a reason to
> dismiss the idea) 
> > 
> > Impacts in general? 
> > 
> > I'll be in listening mode here, so let's have at
> it! 
> > 
> > -73 de Mike KB3EIA - 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > PaQSO mailing list 
> > PaQSO at mailman.qth.net 
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/paqso 
> _______________________________________________


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com